Teams

GAC SILVER

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-25vs KC-CC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngela Seaberg / Katie Deline vs Mikaela Potter / Sarah Chomko3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJuliet Beckman vs Grace Koza2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Hill / Michelle Sachs vs Margaret Lamb / Jodi Thomas7-6, 6-4
2026-08-18vs LTFC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatie Deline / Anna Reed vs Lori Benson / Kim Ripka5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJuliet Beckman vs Sophia Vukovich5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Sachs / Chelsea Ye vs Carol Jochens / Elizabeth Bendalin2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-08-11vs CP REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesJuliet Beckman / Anna Reed vs Lauren Perry / Irene Mendelsberg2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRachel Rodgers vs Ally Debastiani6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKingsley Parsley / Michelle Sachs vs Stephanie Campbell / Aubrey Zahuranec7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2026-08-04vs LTFC GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnna Reed / Angela Seaberg vs Ki Kellen / Julia Bridgewater6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRachel Rodgers vs Kristin Kuruvila6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChelsea Ye / Julie Hill vs Lindsi Darnell / Danielle Martines6-4, 6-4
2026-07-28vs WP PURPLELost 12
L#1 DoublesChelsea Ye / Juliet Beckman vs Erin Eggland / Meredith Hughes1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJaclyn Burnside vs Michelle Miller6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAngela Seaberg / Kingsley Parsley vs Madison Hoffman / Leslie Hanna2-6, 3-6
2026-07-21vs JCC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngela Seaberg / Anna Reed vs Khanh Huyen / Jenny Loeff3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRachel Rodgers vs Anitra Sopronyi6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKatie Deline / Chelsea Ye vs Kelsey Berlin / Hanna Feldman4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.56
Rachel Rodgers
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.32
Jaclyn Burnside
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.25
Michelle Sachs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Katie Deline
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.04
Chelsea Ye
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.96
Angela Seaberg
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.92
Juliet Beckman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.88
Kingsley Parsley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Anna Reed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Julie Hill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juliet Beckman + Anna Reed1442% games+5.7% vs expected
Katie Deline + Chelsea Ye8857% games+3.0% vs expected
Chelsea Ye + Michelle Sachs4149% gamesnot enough data
Angela Seaberg + Chelsea Ye134 matchesnot enough data
Juliet Beckman + Chelsea Ye123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Rodgers
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
4.56
Jaclyn Burnside
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Michelle Sachs
52W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Katie Deline
72W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Chelsea Ye
91W–114L career · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
4.04
4.5
Angela Seaberg
11W–24L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.96
4.5
Juliet Beckman
30W–52L career · 4 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
3.92
4.5
Kingsley Parsley
39W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.88
4.5
Anna Reed
7W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.83
Julie Hill
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.