Teams

Mi.Ladd18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-27Won 20
W#1 DoublesJack Baur / Brett McLeod vs Michael McGuire / Avery Sparrow6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Ladd / Davis Felts vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-13vs Pe.Kelly18ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesJack Baur / Christopher Brown vs Jackson Bowen / Thomas Wilbur7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDavis Felts / Andrew Pham vs Joao Freitas / Wilson Sawyer3-6, 3-6
2025-03-30vs Co.Vinson18ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesJack Baur / Matthew Short vs Praveen Chandrasekhar / Carlos Garcia-Shelton6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAndrew Dinicola vs Kenton McKeeman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-03-23vs Ma.Gregson18A4.5Split 11
W#2 SinglesAndrew Dinicola vs Jeron Russell6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Ladd / Philippe Adams vs Maxwell Gregson / Michael Weslander1-6, 1-6
2025-03-16vs Ma.Treires18ALost 12
L#2 DoublesBrett McLeod / Davis Felts vs Mark Treires / James Treires2-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesAndrew Dinicola vs William Gray6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJack Baur / Matthew Short vs Richard McClenny / Ryan Bernthal2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-09vs De.Farmer18A4.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesDavis Felts / Murillo Pelegrino vs Nathan Mercado / Jason Coble6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichael Ladd / Andrew Dinicola vs Dempsey Farmer / LaQuon Gilchrist6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJack Baur vs Eric Roller6-3, 6-4
2025-03-02vs Bl.Hutchinson18AWon 21
W#2 DoublesJeff Vajay / Jack Baur vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAndrew Dinicola vs Brett Eckles6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDavis Felts / Douglas Friedman vs Kwame Owens / Beomjun Ju2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Jeff Vajay
published
4.42
Brett McLeod
published 4.5
4.40
Andrew Dinicola
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.35
Kevin Powell
published
4.20
Jack Baur
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.11
Davis Felts
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.88
Kevin Wolborsky
published
3.79
Philippe Adams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Dinicola + Davis Felts6746% games+0.8% vs expected
Jack Baur + Davis Felts2543% gamesnot enough data
Philippe Adams + Davis Felts033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Vajay
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
4.45
4.5
Brett McLeod
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Andrew Dinicola
45W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
4.40
Kevin Powell
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
4.35
4.5
Jack Baur
87W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.20
4.5
Davis Felts
63W–95L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
Kevin Wolborsky
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Philippe Adams
81W–74L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.