Teams

LA - Liveball Crew

2025 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Men 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-12vs LA - Misfits and MishitsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMusa Khan / Ian Bachrach vs Shawn Robertson / Anthony A Vo3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Boehm / Ted Meisel vs David Delgado / David Kane0-6, 0-6
2025-10-05vs LA - Griffin Club 4.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesMatthew Lam / Steve Schwartz vs Jeffrey Kabot / Mark Miscavage0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMusa Khan / Ted Meisel vs Mitesh Patel / Michael Vanderhyden7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMatthew Boehm / James Lo vs Robert Baker / Robin Saacks4-6, 3-6
2025-09-21vs LA - Good FriendsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRoger Shih / Ian Bachrach vs Greg Harlan / SEUNG KIM3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoezen Punongbayan / James Lo vs TJ St Marie / Jason Nam3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesIan Bachrach / Joezen Punongbayan vs Ben Remis / Nicholas Klein1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRoger Shih / Tuan Ngo vs Andrew Chon / Daniel McDonald3-6, 4-6
2025-09-06vs LA - Dragon FireLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarc Crossman / Ian Bachrach vs Greg Abramson / Chase Wrenn1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTed Meisel / Tuan Ngo vs Stephen Nimick / Daniel Shao1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMike Jensen / James Lo vs Alberto Asuncion / Lloyd Liang7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Matthew Lam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Dlano Beckles
published 4
Ian Bachrach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Tuan Ngo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Mike Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Matthew Boehm
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
James Lo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Joezen Punongbayan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Marc Crossman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Musa Khan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roger Shih
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ted Meisel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Lam
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Dlano Beckles
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Ian Bachrach
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tuan Ngo
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
Mike Jensen
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Matthew Boehm
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
James Lo
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
Joezen Punongbayan
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marc Crossman
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Musa Khan
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roger Shih
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ted Meisel
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.