Teams

Weaver 6.5 CCL

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 40 & OVER · Women 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Wendy McElhinney
published
3.30
Beth Skidmore
published 3.5
3.26
Ann McAdams
published 3.5
3.25
Cindy Worden
published 3.5
3.17
Katie Dattilo
published
3.13
Donna Beaman
published
3.12
Jan Best
published
3.00
Amy Sweyer
published 3
2.93
Hannah Bodemann
published
2.87
Andrea Crumpton
published 3
2.76
Alison Boswell
published 3
2.67
Amy Gibbons
published 3
Pamela Bourgeois
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Sweyer + Wendy McElhinney4255% games+8.3% vs expected
Donna Beaman + Beth Skidmore4146% gamesnot enough data
Amy Sweyer + Cindy Worden314 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Bourgeois + Alison Boswell303 matchesnot enough data
Jan Best + Donna Beaman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy McElhinney
9W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Beth Skidmore
15W–1L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Ann McAdams
10W–5L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Cindy Worden
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Katie Dattilo
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Donna Beaman
10W–11L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Jan Best
6W–11L career · no lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
3
Amy Sweyer
23W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Hannah Bodemann
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Andrea Crumpton
11W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Alison Boswell
6W–1L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Amy Gibbons
7W–4L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Michelle Clark-Bradley
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Pamela Bourgeois
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.