Teams

Dumas-Eaton/6.5/COMBO/40&O/RPAR

2025 Ruston Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women · 6.5 Ruston (40&O) Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-26vs Puckett/6.5/COMBO/40&O/RPARLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeEtte Wick / Cindy Phillips vs Shelley Parker / Ellie Puckett3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Gordon / Tina Otwell vs Sarah Davison / Karen Rogers6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCindy Eaton / Kim Schlessman vs Jennifer Sexton / Linda Causey4-6, 3-6
2025-10-19vs Puckett/6.5/COMBO/40&O/RPARLost 02
L#1 DoublesKim Schlessman / Cindy Eaton vs Ellie Puckett / Erica Norris2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarleen Dumas / Kathy Sutton vs Sarah Davison / Carla Carter0-6, 4-6
2025-10-05vs Puckett/6.5/COMBO/40&O/RPARLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristi Williams / Tina Otwell vs Ellie Puckett / Erica Norris6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCindy Phillips / Cindy Gordon vs Mollie Robbins / Sarah Keyes Jeffords4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie THURSTON / Kathy Sutton vs Shelley Parker / Carla Carter0-6, 2-6
2025-09-28vs Puckett/6.5/COMBO/40&O/RPARSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCindy Gordon / Cindy Phillips vs Jennifer Sexton / Linda Causey6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeEtte Wick / Kathy Sutton vs Shelley Parker / Tami Johnston2-6, 2-6
2025-09-21vs Puckett/6.5/COMBO/40&O/RPARLost 12
W#1 DoublesKristi Williams / Tina Otwell vs Sarah Keyes Jeffords / Mollie Robbins4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Richardson / Cindy Gordon vs Ellie Puckett / Erica Norris0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarleen Dumas / Cindy Eaton vs Jennifer Sexton / Carla Carter3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Ruston (40&O) Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Puckett/6.5/COMBO/40&O/RPAR4110511106
2Dumas-Eaton/6.5/COMBO/40&O/RPAR1451022162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Cindy Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Debbie THURSTON
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Kim Schlessman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Tina Otwell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
DeEtte Wick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.85
Carleen Dumas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.50
Cindy Eaton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Kathy Sutton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Gordon
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Debbie THURSTON
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
Kim Schlessman
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
Tina Otwell
16W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
3.5
DeEtte Wick
3W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.88
3.5
Carleen Dumas
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.85
3
Cindy Eaton
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Kathy Sutton
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.