Teams

CHABOT CANYON CW5.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 5.5

20 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Minjon Hall
published
2.85
Nancy Boswell
published
2.69
Jennifer Bruggeman
published
2.55
Misty Wattenbarger
published
2.52
Jenny Weddle
published
2.50
Lisa Eden
published
2.49
Joey Laurent
published
2.44
Katharine Sullivan
published
2.43
Shang Zhu
published
2.43
Zina Kao
published
2.32
Claire Chen Carter
published 2.5
2.32
Caren McDonald
published 2.5
2.31
Alexis Gordon
published
2.23
Abby Dawkins
published 2.5
2.22
May Lee
published
2.22
Ellen Kinoy
published 2.5
1.99
Brooke Moller
published 2.5
1.99
Jessica McDevitt
published
Rochelle Dineen
published
Shirin Belur
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Misty Wattenbarger + Jennifer Bruggeman0533% games−6.2% vs expected
Zina Kao + Abby Dawkins033 matchesnot enough data
Caren McDonald + Abby Dawkins033 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Weddle + Katharine Sullivan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Minjon Hall
34W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.16
Nancy Boswell
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
Jennifer Bruggeman
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Misty Wattenbarger
2W–16L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Jenny Weddle
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Lisa Eden
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Joey Laurent
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
0%54%46%
2.49
Katharine Sullivan
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.44
Shang Zhu
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.43
Zina Kao
10W–24L career · no lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.43
2.5
Claire Chen Carter
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.32
2.5
Caren McDonald
3W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.32
Alexis Gordon
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Abby Dawkins
2W–16L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
May Lee
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Ellen Kinoy
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Brooke Moller
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Jessica McDevitt
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Rochelle Dineen
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shirin Belur
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.