Teams

Hansen/Gunther Lob Lob Sisterhood

2022 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 4.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.44 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-25vs Greene 40+ Summer FunWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnn Eliason / Bernadette McCann vs Lesley Longval / Erika Skanse6-2, 6-0
2022-06-27vs Wahlstrand Old LadiesWon 10
W#2 DoublesBernadette McCann / Ann Eliason vs Tzivia Leviton / Violet Shortly6-1, 6-2
2022-06-20vs McDonaldLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn Eliason / Bernadette McCann vs Kaelie Breiter / Kiersten Miller Anderson4-6, 6-7
2022-06-13vs Greene 40+ Summer FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesBernadette McCann / Ann Eliason vs Anna Lyon / Jodi Hanish4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-06vs Wahlstrand Old LadiesWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Eliason / Bernadette McCann vs Julie Opfer / Patrice Meger6-3, 6-1
2022-05-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn Eliason / Bernadette McCann vs Jill Johnson / Amy Mitchell5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.73
Danielle Niska
published 5
4.31
Bernadette McCann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.27
Elisabeth Walker
published 4.5
4.16
Beci Bjornson
published 4.5
4.15
Ann Eliason
published 4.5
4.14
Dana Hansen
published 4.5
4.06
Alison Khan
published 4.5
3.84
Lisa Ogren
published
Angela Tridgell
published 4
3.64
Helen Gunther
published 4
3.46
Kristine Paul
published
Lindsay Kallas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bernadette McCann + Ann Eliason3454% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Danielle Niska
18W–5L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.73
4.5
Bernadette McCann
75W–33L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Elisabeth Walker
28W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Beci Bjornson
17W–21L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Ann Eliason
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.15
4.5
Dana Hansen
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Alison Khan
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
4.06
Lisa Ogren
22W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Angela Tridgell
no matches on record · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Helen Gunther
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.64
Kristine Paul
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.46
Lindsay Kallas
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.