Teams

LCTA40/Koepenick/Wild Dunes

USTA 40 & Over Adult Mixed Doubles · 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.27 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-12vs LCTA40/Smith/MPRLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Florkowski / Greg Florkowski vs Susan Cutter / Michael Lavoie3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda McCurry / James McCurry vs Suzie Smith / Hong Pi4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKimberly Moore / Zachary Moore vs Natalie Garrett / Pierre Leblanc1-6, 7-6
2026-06-09vs LCTA40/Murphy/MPRLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Jackson / Brent Jones vs Virginie Murphy / Joshua Hutchins3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDede Davidson / joseph Cooke vs Allison Thomas / Daniel Galt4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrenda McCurry / James McCurry vs Heidi Richter / Benjamin Boisson6-4, 6-4
2026-06-04vs LCTA40/Bjork/LTPDILost 02
L#1 DoublesBrandy Mcmahon / Zachary Moore vs Stephanie Davis / Bill Park1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarrie Riddle / Patrick Riddle vs Brian Tallmadge / Jennifer Tallmadge3-6, 3-6
2026-05-21vs LCTA40/Sutherland/HamlinLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Koepenick / Brent Jones vs Douglas Smith / Kristin Steele3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy West / Zachary Moore vs Kimber Wiggins / Mike Wiggins2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesGreg Florkowski / Melissa Florkowski vs Olga Haefele / Etienne Pichon-Varin3-6, 2-6
2026-05-14vs LCTA40/Tunick/Park WestLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrandy Mcmahon / joseph Cooke vs Jay Cleary / Rebecca Phelps0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Moore / Patrick Riddle vs Jason Smith / Paige Hall2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChris Koepenick / Elizabeth Jackson vs Mindy Spring / Reed Spring1-6, 1-6
W#1 Doublesjoseph Cooke / Brandy Mcmahon vs Erika Blankenship / John Maize6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrent Jones / Heather Koepenick vs Deborah Dauksch / Noppon Kichanan3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarrie Riddle / Patrick Riddle vs Stacey Kinney / Chris Smethers1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Heather Koepenick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Brandy Mcmahon
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Amy West
published 3.5
3.24
Greg Florkowski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Courtney Byrd
published 3.5
3.11
James McCurry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Elizabeth Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.04
joseph Cooke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Patrick Riddle
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Brenda McCurry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Sue Wohlford-Bork
published
2.78
Zachary Moore
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Carrie Riddle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Chris Koepenick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Melissa Florkowski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Dede Davidson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Kyla Cooke
published
Kimberly Moore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Florkowski + Greg Florkowski044 matchesnot enough data
Brenda McCurry + James McCurry134 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Riddle + Patrick Riddle134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heather Koepenick
73W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Brandy Mcmahon
75W–74L career · 9 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Amy West
40W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Greg Florkowski
4W–11L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Courtney Byrd
49W–30L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
James McCurry
3W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Elizabeth Jackson
45W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.07
joseph Cooke
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Patrick Riddle
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Brenda McCurry
42W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
Sue Wohlford-Bork
49W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Zachary Moore
0W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.78
3
Carrie Riddle
38W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Chris Koepenick
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Florkowski
21W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Dede Davidson
40W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.58
Kyla Cooke
11W–5L career · no lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
Kimberly Moore
22W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.