Teams

On The Liners - Broadlands

2021 Loudoun Adult 40 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-07-19vs Causing a Racquet - River CreekWon 10
W#3 DoublesMoo Hackett / Nicole Leppert vs Rachel McMichael / Lisa Moffett6-3, 6-4
2021-07-14vs Cicada Smashers - AVSPLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathy Hoehner / Moo Hackett vs Lisa Zimmerman / Mary Ann Larson4-6, 2-6
2021-06-30vs 40-Love - AVSPWon 20
W#2 DoublesSheila Harrell / Lisa Wolff vs Mary Beth Greason / Angela Kane6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMoo Hackett / Margaret Amy Flaherty vs Sharon DiRenzo / Kimianne Lee6-3, 6-1
2021-06-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesMoo Hackett / Margaret Amy Flaherty vs Beth Elrefai / Andrea Hallett6-3, 6-4
2021-06-23vs Cicada Smashers - AVSPLost 01
L#1 DoublesSian Perez-Baumann / Sheila Harrell vs Jennifer Larner / Laura Sagen0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Moo Hackett
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 4.5
Bethe Halpern
published 4
3.73
Niki Gerhard
published
3.43
Sheila Harrell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Lisa Wolff
published
3.25
Anne Marie Randolph
published 3.5
3.13
Kimberly Murray
published
3.08
Jen Kaine
published
3.08
3.02
3.02
Julie Mandia
published
2.96
Nicole Leppert
published
2.91
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Moo Hackett
91W–79L career · 8 lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
3.90
4
Bethe Halpern
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Niki Gerhard
29W–39L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Sheila Harrell
132W–87L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.43
Lisa Wolff
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
3.40
3.5
Anne Marie Randolph
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Kimberly Murray
7W–15L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
Jen Kaine
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
Margaret Amy Flaherty
5W–10L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Adelaide Turnbull
9W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%44%56%
3.02
Julie Mandia
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.02
Nicole Leppert
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
63%37%<1%
2.96
Mary Beth Williamson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.