Teams

OC Mesa Verde CC - Kayla -Sat 1

2024 OC 55 & Over Mixed Doubles · OC WE 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-23vs OC LPC Diekneit - Sat11Split 11
W#1 DoublesAngela Vrebalovich / Ernest Curtis vs Karen Holmes / Jeff Holmes5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Barloon / Ron Luebbert vs Sophia Yim / Bill Yim1-6, 2-6
2024-11-03vs OC LLW LPC - Debra - Sat1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAimee Boyles / Ron Luebbert vs Ellen Yang / Jon Wang1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Vrebalovich / Don Harper vs Mai Gu / Frank Zeng1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Barloon / Ernest Curtis vs Gina Moore / Agee Barooni2-6, 2-6
2024-10-19vs OC LLW LPC - Debra - Sat1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Hirsch / Don Harper vs Brian Richardson / Gina Moore2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAimee Boyles / Ron Luebbert vs Jun Yuan / Christine Ly1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Barloon / Milton Kawabe vs Li Xu / Susie Xie0-6, 3-6
2024-09-28vs OC LLW LPC - Debra - Sat1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDon Harper / Nancy Hirsch vs Jon Wang / Ellen Yang3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Bird / Ron Luebbert vs Michelle Sinclair / Frank Zeng1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKim Dexter / Paul Dexter vs Jun Yuan / Susie Xie0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC WE 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Aimee Boyles
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Nancy Hirsch
published
Catherine Bird
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Don Harper
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Angela Vrebalovich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Ernest Curtis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Barloon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kim Dexter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Marcopulos
published
Milton Kawabe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Dexter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ron Luebbert
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aimee Boyles
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
Nancy Hirsch
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.59
3
Catherine Bird
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Don Harper
0W–5L career · type M · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Angela Vrebalovich
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
2.58
Ernest Curtis
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Barloon
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kim Dexter
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Linda Marcopulos
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Milton Kawabe
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Paul Dexter
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Ron Luebbert
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.