Teams

DConrad/SSmulktis (Park Road)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 14 9:30 AM
vs
Park Road Park
Sep 21 9:30 AM
Park Road Park
Sep 28 9:30 AM
vs Providence Plantation Racquet/Swim Club
Danielle ConradSarah Smulktis
Oct 5 9:30 AM
vs
Ballantyne Country Club
2026-09-01vs LGignac (Carmel)Won 21
L#1 DoublesChristi Hart / Jenny Duncan vs Suzannah Hicks / Cynthia Nicholson1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLiz Ostrow / Sarah Smulktis vs Dana Fox / Rosie Rogers7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDanielle Conrad / Julie Grahl vs Whitney Smith / Lindy Gignac6-1, 6-4
2026-08-31vs HPhelps (Bridgehampton)Won 30
W#1 DoublesLiz Ostrow / Erin Lentz vs Heather Hope / Roxanne Kastein7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristi Hart / Jenny Duncan vs Emily Breeze Watson / Ashley Bowles6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMaria Mascia / Elizabeth Ross vs Lisa Laws / Tara Wilson6-2, 1-0
2026-08-24vs TBasinger (CSRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Smulktis / Elizabeth Ross vs Joe-Anne Saldarini / Ashley Barton2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRosalyn Kartes / Erin Lentz vs Laura Williams / Lisa Stewart2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Grahl / Nicole Woodley vs Lynn Hughes / Amanda Price4-6, 4-6
2026-08-17vs AAugustine/Titlestad (OPRC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesJenny Duncan / Elizabeth Ross vs Lisa Kane / Sharon Gehrig7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLiz Ostrow / Traci Semones vs Debbie Titlestad / Christina Goldblatt6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSherri Ehrenberg / Christi Hart vs Leslie Peterson / Allison Homan6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TBasinger (CSRC)2060129
2FOno/TGreen (Chestnut Square Park)2051332
3JBlack (Queens)2051452
4CKahm/ASherrill (Queens)2042550
5MMiller (Queens)1021222
6DConrad/SSmulktis (Park Road)1021223
7WParker (Queens)1142445
8JGardiner (OPRC)1142564
9AAugustine/Titlestad (OPRC)1133751
10WJourdan (PPRSC)1124960
11HPhelps (Bridgehampton)0224954
12KCrosby/KMartin (Sardis)02151065
13AStein (Ballantyne CC)02151172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Rosalyn Kartes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Liz Ostrow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.16
Christi Hart
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
Julie Grahl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.99
Sherri Ehrenberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Danielle Conrad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Laura Clancy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.89
Maria Mascia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Traci Semones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Sarah Smulktis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Erin Lentz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Nicole Woodley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Jenny Duncan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Clancy + Rosalyn Kartes7065% games+13.8% vs expected
Danielle Conrad + Sarah Smulktis13166% games+10.4% vs expected
Nicole Woodley + Erin Lentz7457% games+4.0% vs expected
Christi Hart + Sherri Ehrenberg5362% games+1.8% vs expected
Julie Grahl + Rosalyn Kartes9261% games+1.4% vs expected
Erin Lentz + Liz Ostrow3255% games−5.5% vs expected
Christi Hart + Jenny Duncan224 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Smulktis + Liz Ostrow404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Rosalyn Kartes
144W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
Liz Ostrow
42W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Christi Hart
19W–26L career · type D · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
4.16
Julie Grahl
27W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.12
Sherri Ehrenberg
84W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Danielle Conrad
33W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.96
Laura Clancy
47W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
Maria Mascia
8W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
80%20%<1%
3.89
4
Traci Semones
139W–57L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Sarah Smulktis
96W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Erin Lentz
18W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.72
Nicole Woodley
19W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
Jenny Duncan
28W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.