Teams

Smart Aces

2021 NOVA Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-01vs Day GrippersWon 20
W#1 SinglesAlixandria Lapp vs Millette Miller6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSara Franklin / Errin Matechak vs HEATHER HUGHES / Elizabeth Pyszka6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-24vs Rally GalsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMaria Elena Greene / Alixandria Lapp vs Jennifer Ayoub / Karen Hodges3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTrisha Downey / Errin Matechak vs Tanya Loyd / Teresa Plott2-6, 0-6
2021-05-17vs Love HurtsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlixandria Lapp / Melanie Way vs Jenny Hein / Julie Kyle6-1, 6-4
2021-05-10vs Overserved - AgainSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMaria Elena Greene vs Laura Sagen6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesErrin Matechak / Holly Radus vs Laurie Bennett / Lauren Mencia7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-26vs Day GrippersWon 10
W#2 DoublesMaria Elena Greene / Alixandria Lapp vs HEATHER HUGHES / Deanne Iverson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-19vs Rally GalsWon 10
W#3 DoublesAlixandria Lapp / Sara Franklin vs Debra Ciesar / Karen Hodges6-4, 6-2
2021-04-12Split 11
L#2 DoublesAlixandria Lapp / Monica Granovsky vs Angela Kane / Kelly Stanley6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesErrin Matechak / Holly Radus vs Laura Hathaway / Yesim Temeemi6-3, 6-0
2021-04-05vs Overserved - AgainWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaria Elena Greene / Erin Malawer vs Stacey Wood / Elizabeth Hamilton4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Errin Matechak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Edie Ashton
published 4
3.41
Robin Birchfield
published
3.40
Maria Elena Greene
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Alixandria Lapp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.23
Monica Granovsky
published
2.94
Sara Franklin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Elena Greene + Alixandria Lapp341855% games+5.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Errin Matechak
176W–161L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Edie Ashton
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Robin Birchfield
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Maria Elena Greene
67W–44L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Alixandria Lapp
63W–49L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Monica Granovsky
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Sara Franklin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
68%32%<1%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.