Teams

Valencia Bonita - Gredinger

2023 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-09vs Marco Ymca - ConteLost 01
L#2 DoublesMaria Prochilo / Vicki MacE vs Peggy Chandler / Joyce Hail6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Prochilo / Shirley Yagoda vs Mia Delk / Sally Amato2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMaria Prochilo / Shirley Yagoda vs Heather Claes / Donna Dolan6-2, 6-0
2023-04-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesMaria Prochilo / Shirley Yagoda vs Ann Luth / Dianne Ament6-0, 6-2
2023-03-28vs Pelican Bay South - HowardWon 10
W#2 DoublesMaria Prochilo / Joan Ravens vs Beth HUGHES / Rosemary Marinone6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Bobbi Burnett
published 3.5
3.04
Eva Migacz
published
2.89
Shirley Yagoda
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Ellen Iverson
published
Eva Piazza
published
Glenda Stein
published
Joan Ravens
published
Kate Gredinger
published
Lorraine Steuerer
published
Maria Prochilo
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Patricia Doran
published
Rita Leone
published
Sue Capps
published
Theresa Sullivan
published
Vicki MacE
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Gredinger + Lorraine Steuerer14660% gamesnot enough data
Maria Prochilo + Glenda Stein4251% gamesnot enough data
Glenda Stein + Lorraine Steuerer6061% gamesnot enough data
Maria Prochilo + Rita Leone213 matchesnot enough data
Maria Prochilo + Shirley Yagoda213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bobbi Burnett
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Eva Migacz
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Shirley Yagoda
155W–105L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
Ellen Iverson
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Eva Piazza
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Glenda Stein
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joan Ravens
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kate Gredinger
32W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lorraine Steuerer
21W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maria Prochilo
48W–52L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Doran
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rita Leone
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sue Capps
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Theresa Sullivan
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vicki MacE
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.