Teams

Smith-Lethal Lobsters-KCC

*2025 Adult 65 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 NoHo Women · 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesPamela Acosta / Beth MacE vs Carol Buonfiglio / Jeanne Houston5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Descioli / Janis Savatsky vs Cindy Thompson / Eunice Skehan5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisbeth Andrews / Helen Irion vs Sherry Bonds / Elizabeth Hensley4-6, 4-6
2025-10-01vs Meyer-KCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesPamela Acosta / Janet Smith vs Druann Bosien / Gena Young6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLisbeth Andrews / Kerry Orth vs Carol Kollehner / Janine Batterton6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBeth MacE / Jane Wenner vs Dolores Meyer / Martha Preston6-1, 6-3
2025-09-24vs Raney-Walden on Lake HoustonWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeth MacE / Susan Descioli vs Dorothy Gerloff / Nancy Schneider2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanis Savatsky / Donna Wenner vs Linda Harper / Maria Moran2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKerry Orth / Lisbeth Andrews vs Eileen Cocetti / Deborah Edwards6-1, 7-5
L#1 DoublesJanis Savatsky / Jane Wenner vs Carol Buonfiglio / Jeanne Houston4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMaribel Perrin / Helen Irion vs Elizabeth Hensley / Sherry Bonds4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Descioli / Janet Smith vs Brenda Palamar / Laura Williams5-7, 4-6
2025-09-10vs Meyer-KCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesHelen Irion / Maribel Perrin vs Janice Laws / Pamela Heck6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanis Savatsky / Jane Wenner vs Janine Batterton / Debbie Becker6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDonna Wenner / Beth MacE vs Martha Preston / Carol Kollehner6-0, 6-3
2025-09-03vs Raney-Walden on Lake HoustonWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeth MacE / Helen Irion vs Dorothy Gerloff / Nancy Schneider2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJanis Savatsky / Jane Wenner vs Eileen Cocetti / Debbie Bryant6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDonna Wenner / Kerry Orth vs Linda Harper / Deborah Edwards6-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Susan Descioli
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Beth MacE
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Kerry Orth
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Janis Savatsky
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.17
Maribel Perrin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Helen Irion
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Donna Wenner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Lisbeth Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jane Wenner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Pamela Acosta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth MacE + Helen Irion2544% games+1.3% vs expected
Lisbeth Andrews + Helen Irion3740% games−6.6% vs expected
Maribel Perrin + Helen Irion2450% gamesnot enough data
Maribel Perrin + Susan Descioli2346% gamesnot enough data
Janis Savatsky + Jane Wenner3263% gamesnot enough data
Susan Descioli + Beth MacE2346% gamesnot enough data
Janis Savatsky + Susan Descioli123 matchesnot enough data
Donna Wenner + Jane Wenner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Descioli
23W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Beth MacE
13W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Kerry Orth
16W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Janis Savatsky
12W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Maribel Perrin
9W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Helen Irion
12W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Donna Wenner
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
Lisbeth Andrews
12W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Jane Wenner
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Acosta
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.