Teams

Hot Shots

2026 Summer Smash Doubles · Womens 3.0

4 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-15vs Diamonds In The RoughLost 01
L#1 DoublesTonja Horn / Teresa McCourt vs Gloria Gordon / Rhonda Walker6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-20vs Deuce BabyLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Barrett / Ann Teague vs Staci Shafer / Zenaida Camacho4-6, 1-6
2026-06-16vs Thomas/RB/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Mccrary / Teresa McCourt vs Natalie Armstrong / Nancy Szabados Thomas6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Tonja Horn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Ann Teague
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.26
Teresa McCourt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.17
Catherine Mccrary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Mccrary + Teresa McCourt2445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Tonja Horn
18W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Ann Teague
0W–5L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Teresa McCourt
14W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Catherine Mccrary
18W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.