Teams

PD18/Flynn/PTC

2026 USTA Mixed Doubles 18 & Over - PD · 3.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-27vs PD18/Anderson/FTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesDanyelle Hayes / Tyler Hayes vs Christopher Turner / Brandi Davis3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJean Mcintosh / Sher Chhetri vs HoChieh Huang / Rachel Lane3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMyra Rivera / Luciano Filho vs Joseph Protiva / Celeste Wearing3-6, 3-6
2026-07-26vs PD18/Braddock/HCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesOlga Pak / Sher Chhetri vs Dusty Braddock / Andrew Pegram3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarina Wood / Paul Wood vs Tatum Warr / Darrin St Ours3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKayla Johnson / Sean Flynn vs Rachel Ingram / Allen Grantham0-6, 0-6
2026-07-21vs PD18/Braddock/HCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarina Wood / Paul Wood vs Darrin St Ours / Dusty Braddock6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSean Flynn / Danyelle Hayes vs Robert Askins / Tatum Warr5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJenny Thigpen / Josh Edington vs Rachel Ingram / Zatavious Cotton2-6, 1-6
2026-07-19vs PD18/Wightman/EBELost 12
L#1 DoublesJenny Thigpen / Sher Chhetri vs Raghunandan Kandala / Haley Wightman3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJean Mcintosh / Josh Edington vs Tesfaye Kidane / Kelli McGregor1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKayla Johnson / Dave Ginnow vs Mike Wightman / Helen Carroll6-1, 6-2
2026-07-01vs PD18/Wightman/EBELost 03
L#1 DoublesTyler Hayes / Danyelle Hayes vs Haley Wightman / Jonathan Matthews4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesOlga Pak / Dave Ginnow vs Mike Wightman / Ning Wharton4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMyra Rivera / Josh Edington vs Raghunandan Kandala / Haixia Xi0-6, 0-6
2026-06-28vs PD 3.0M 18 & Over (Weinberg)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMarina Wood / Paul Wood vs Holly McCabe / Julien Weinberg6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKayla Johnson / Sean Flynn vs Jessica Weinberg / Jim Cromwell4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJean Mcintosh / Luciano Filho vs Sharlyne Battle / Chris Moody1-6, 1-6
2026-05-17vs PD18/Anderson/FTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesDave Ginnow / Jenny Thigpen vs Christopher Turner / Misty Lee3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaul Wood / Kayla Johnson vs Joseph Protiva / Brandi Davis7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSean Flynn / Olga Pak vs Dan Dynan / Rebecca Anderson2-6, 1-6
2026-05-12vs PD 3.0M 18 & Over (Weinberg)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDave Ginnow / Jean Mcintosh vs Jessica Weinberg / Chris Moody1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTyler Hayes / Danyelle Hayes vs Holly McCabe / Julien Weinberg6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJosh Edington / Kayla Johnson vs Jasmine Burks / Rodney Barr II1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PD 3.0M 18 & Over (Weinberg)6216818163
2PD18/Anderson/FTC26101432239
3PD18/Flynn/PTC0832142261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Dave Ginnow
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.02
Paul Wood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.70
Sher Chhetri
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Jean Mcintosh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.50
Danyelle Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.45
Jenny Thigpen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.35
Josh Edington
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.13
Marina Wood
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.06
Myra Rivera
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.93
Olga Pak
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kayla Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Luciano Filho
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tyler Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marina Wood + Paul Wood7363% games+25.8% vs expected
Danyelle Hayes + Tyler Hayes1542% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dave Ginnow
13W–11L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
Paul Wood
19W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Sher Chhetri
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Jean Mcintosh
9W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
2.5
Danyelle Hayes
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
Jenny Thigpen
8W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45
Josh Edington
0W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
2.35
Marina Wood
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Myra Rivera
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Olga Pak
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Kayla Johnson
2W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Luciano Filho
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tyler Hayes
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.