Teams

LCTA40/Cladakis/MPR

2022 STA 40 & Over Combo Doubles · 40 & Over Combo Men - 8.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.30 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo Men - 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Paul Carmola
published
4.33
George Clonts
published 4.5
4.25
Brandon Owens
published 4.5
4.23
Monty Shealy
published
4.23
Chris Kiesel
published 4.5
4.02
Justin Mather
published
3.99
William Estes
published
3.92
Claudio Carrara
published 4
3.84
Thomas Browne
published
3.80
Michael Millican
published
3.74
Michael Hauser
published
3.68
Nima Moghadam
published
3.59
Mike Cladakis
published
3.59
Bert Gierhart
published 4
Greg Yancey
published
William Shelley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Hauser + Monty Shealy6061% games+4.8% vs expected
Michael Hauser + Claudio Carrara7066% games+4.5% vs expected
Claudio Carrara + Bert Gierhart6355% games+1.3% vs expected
Brandon Owens + Monty Shealy4453% games−0.9% vs expected
Michael Hauser + Bert Gierhart4257% games−3.1% vs expected
Michael Hauser + Paul Carmola5451% games−4.6% vs expected
Claudio Carrara + Paul Carmola5453% gamesnot enough data
Michael Hauser + Mike Cladakis224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Carmola
69W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
George Clonts
37W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Brandon Owens
33W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
4.25
Monty Shealy
39W–17L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Chris Kiesel
21W–19L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
Justin Mather
25W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
4.02
William Estes
11W–25L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Claudio Carrara
103W–35L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
Thomas Browne
37W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
Michael Millican
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Michael Hauser
134W–60L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Nima Moghadam
53W–55L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Mike Cladakis
42W–44L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Bert Gierhart
43W–33L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Greg Yancey
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
William Shelley
26W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.