Teams

Mitchell

2025 Mixed 18 & over 3.0 - 5.0 · 4.0 Adult 18 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-03vs SH - MinshewLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiana McCutcheon / Johnny Maplesden vs Eric Garrison / Sharon Garrison4-6
2024-12-01vs SH - MinshewLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Coleman / Hallie Mauldin vs Chad Oakley / Molly Mason1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesClaire Mitchell / Johnny Maplesden vs Lauren Buckner / Teddy Champion6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-26vs SH - MinshewSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEugene Schrock / Julia Matthews vs Thomas Minshew / Alyssa Minshew3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Coleman / Casey McKean vs Eric Garrison / Sharon Garrison6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-11-23vs SH - MinshewLost 01
L#2 DoublesEugene Schrock / Julia Matthews vs Eric Garrison / Sharon Garrison1-6, 2-6
2024-11-11vs SH - MinshewLost 02
L#1 DoublesEugene Schrock / Julia Matthews vs Thomas Minshew / Alyssa Minshew5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Coleman / Casey McKean vs Jim Watkins / Lauren Buckner6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-11-03vs SH - MinshewLost 03
L#1 DoublesEugene Schrock / Diana McCutcheon vs Thomas Minshew / Alyssa Minshew0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Matthews / William Martin vs Chad Oakley / Molly Mason2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesClaire Mitchell / Johnny Maplesden vs Teddy Champion / Hannah Carroll3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Johnny Maplesden
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Eugene Schrock
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Sandra Kirk
published
3.54
Diana McCutcheon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Casey McKean
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Julia Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Hallie Mauldin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
William Martin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eugene Schrock + Julia Matthews033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Johnny Maplesden
40W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Eugene Schrock
16W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
Sandra Kirk
10W–21L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Diana McCutcheon
33W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.54
3.5
Casey McKean
52W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
Julia Matthews
46W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Hallie Mauldin
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
William Martin
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.