Teams

Haire

Mixed 18 & Over · Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

6 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-03vs StewartLost 02
L#1 DoublesKayla Hubble / Dustin Haire vs Brent Abilez / Mandy Weaver6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJames McDuffie / Kathleen Pfluger vs John Vasquez / Kymberli Harper3-2
2026-07-22vs RossWon 10
W#2 DoublesKayla Hubble / James McDuffie vs Archana Rao / Mason Brooks6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2026-07-01vs RossLost 02
L#1 DoublesKayla Hubble / Colby Chesshire vs Sol Mayer / Tina Ashley1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Pfluger / Dustin Haire vs Jared Urbantke / Natalie Pfluger4-6, 3-6
2026-06-24vs StewartSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDustin Haire / Jannice Rivero vs Halle Jost / Jacob Maenius3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTrinity Pfluger / Jose Reyes vs Brian Jackson / Leslie Jackson7-5, 6-1
2026-06-17vs HeltonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJose Reyes / Jen Herring vs Jon Cauthorn / Caylee Schellhase7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDustin Haire / Kathleen Pfluger vs Kaleb Nance / Veronica Gutierrez3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-17vs HeltonLost 02
L#1 DoublesJose Reyes / Jen Herring vs Jon Cauthorn / Amy Hill3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesColby Chesshire / Kayla Hubble vs Kaleb Nance / Veronica Gutierrez3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Mixed 18 & Over 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Stewart5113511123
2Helton4211721173
3Haire2461226190
4Ross1561224177

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Jose Reyes
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.82
Dustin Haire
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.78
Kayla Hubble
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Jen Herring
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
James McDuffie
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Morgan Wood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dustin Haire + Jen Herring123 matchesnot enough data
Kayla Hubble + Jose Reyes303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jose Reyes
44W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.90
Dustin Haire
23W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Kayla Hubble
41W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.78
Jen Herring
53W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.67
James McDuffie
38W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
Morgan Wood
13W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.