Teams

MCAC:Craig:Craig

2024 Cape Tri-Level 18 & Over Women · 4.0 Women 1

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-02-29vs MCAC:Harbilas:HarbilasLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Taylor / Michelle Waldron vs Pamela Feeney / Nicole Waldron0-6, 3-6
2024-02-22vs MCAC:Harbilas:HarbilasWon 10
W#1 DoublesJane Craig / Denise Wright vs Pamela Feeney / Karin Mazzoni1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-02-15vs MCAC:Harbilas:HarbilasLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Taylor / Michelle Waldron vs Lauriene Morin / Nicole Waldron4-6, 3-6
2024-02-08vs MCAC:Harbilas:HarbilasWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Taylor / Michelle Waldron vs Alison Harbilas / Karin Mazzoni6-3, 6-2
2024-02-01vs MCAC:Harbilas:HarbilasLost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Craig / Heather Palmer vs Lauriene Morin / Nicole Waldron4-6, 1-6
2024-01-25vs MCAC:Harbilas:HarbilasLost 01
L#1 DoublesDenise Wright / Michelle Waldron vs Pamela Feeney / Nicole Waldron4-6, 2-4
2024-01-18vs MCAC:Harbilas:HarbilasLost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Craig / Christine Taylor vs Alison Harbilas / Lauriene Morin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCAC:Harbilas:Harbilas5252550
2MCAC:Craig:Craig25251168

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Jane Craig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Michelle Waldron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Christine Taylor
published 4
Denise Wright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Heather Palmer
published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Craig
117W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.90
Michelle Waldron
41W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Christine Taylor
25W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Denise Wright
30W–61L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Heather Palmer
16W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.