Teams

Team Romanek

2022 Calvert Mixed 18 & Over · Calvert Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.43 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-12vs Team PhungLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Grimes / Maria Birnkammer vs Catherine Wynne / Clayton Coker2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLori Romanek / Jonathan Griner vs William Marley / Nhi Phung6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-05-10vs Team PhungSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJonathan Ferrell / Ashly Blair vs William Marley / Nhi Phung6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesFREDERICK DONOVAN / Maria Birnkammer vs Bruce Willhide / Catherine Wynne3-6, 3-6
2022-05-10vs Team PhungWon 10
W#2 DoublesLori Romanek / Jonathan Griner vs Les Lebow / Becky Lebow6-4, 6-1
2022-05-05vs Team PhungLost 01
L#1 DoublesLori Romanek / Kelly Grimes vs Nhi Phung / Les Lebow6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-05-03vs Team PhungSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaria Birnkammer / Jonathan Griner vs Michael Cui / Becky Lebow2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAshly Blair / Jonathan Ferrell vs Patricia Louden / Bruce Willhide3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-21vs Team PhungWon 10
W#2 DoublesJonathan Ferrell / Ashly Blair vs Clayton Coker / Mary Oxendine6-2, 6-2
2022-04-19vs Team PhungLost 01
L#3 DoublesJames Borell / Maria Birnkammer vs Catherine Wynne / Bruce Willhide2-6, 3-6
2022-04-14vs Team PhungSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAshly Blair / Jonathan Ferrell vs Nhi Phung / Les Lebow6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLori Romanek / Kelly Grimes vs Michael Cui / Becky Lebow3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Calvert Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
John Jiang
published
3.42
Maria Birnkammer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.40
Jonathan Ferrell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Jennifer Arthur
published
3.26
James Borell
published 3.5
3.19
Lori Romanek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Cindi Hodskins
published 3.5
2.88
Lynn Hoffman
published
2.73
2.69
Carol Donovan
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Jiang
10W–1L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
3.5
Maria Birnkammer
97W–141L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
4
Jonathan Ferrell
101W–197L career · 4 lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.40
Jennifer Arthur
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
James Borell
2W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Lori Romanek
45W–75L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Cindi Hodskins
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Lynn Hoffman
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
FREDERICK DONOVAN
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Carol Donovan
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.