Teams

GEPTA/18&over/3.5M/Ferris/EPCC

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Bill Ruddock
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
Enrique Mirazo
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Genaro Roldan
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Greg Daw
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Greg DiDonna
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Humberto Cardiel
usually #2 Doubles 32%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Isaac Licona
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
JOSE MENDEZ
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Javier Navarro
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published
Lee Montion
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Marcus Kern
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Micah Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Ferris
published
Miguel Ramos Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Paul Leslie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
TJ Karam
usually #2 Doubles 48%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
Terry Calhoun
usually #3 Doubles 51%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Zachary Daw
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Leslie + Enrique Mirazo2542% games+4.9% vs expected
Terry Calhoun + Greg Daw91349% games+2.9% vs expected
Paul Leslie + Micah Harrison17753% games+1.5% vs expected
JOSE MENDEZ + Miguel Ramos Gonzalez101249% gamesnot enough data
Terry Calhoun + TJ Karam16556% gamesnot enough data
Greg Daw + Zachary Daw10461% gamesnot enough data
Bill Ruddock + Humberto Cardiel5649% gamesnot enough data
Miguel Ramos Gonzalez + Bill Ruddock6455% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bill Ruddock
73W–81L career · 35 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Enrique Mirazo
79W–93L career · 30 lines in 2026
not enough data
Genaro Roldan
18W–14L career · 25 lines in 2026
not enough data
Greg Daw
65W–75L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Greg DiDonna
22W–30L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Humberto Cardiel
51W–62L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Isaac Licona
18W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
JOSE MENDEZ
33W–43L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Javier Navarro
28W–22L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lee Montion
7W–15L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marcus Kern
30W–13L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Micah Harrison
49W–64L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Ferris
7W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Miguel Ramos Gonzalez
33W–47L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paul Leslie
85W–78L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
TJ Karam
74W–40L career · 31 lines in 2026
not enough data
Terry Calhoun
76W–68L career · 37 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zachary Daw
36W–19L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.