Teams

FK - Long

2023 Marion Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-21vs FK - CopelandLost 01
L#2 DoublesPatricia Tremblay / Pamela Rice vs Lucy Kaul / Hera Peterson4-6, 4-6
2023-12-02vs GO - HollnagelLost 01
L#2 DoublesOksana Velis / Pamela Rice vs Jenny Tompkins / Lauren Stevenson1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-11-18vs FK - CopelandWon 10
W#2 DoublesPamela Rice / Oksana Velis vs Lucy Kaul / Ellen Perrone6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-11-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Capps / Pamela Rice vs Melissa Quigley / Barbara Obenour Scully6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-11-03vs MARION/Millsaps/Combo18&Over6.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesTatyana Liversedge / Pamela Rice vs Kelly Acevedo / Kayleen Quinn0-6, 2-6
2023-10-28vs FK - CopelandLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatricia Tremblay / Pamela Rice vs Melissa Lozano / Lucy Kaul1-6, 1-6
2023-10-15vs MARION/Millsaps/Combo18&Over6.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesPatricia Tremblay / Pamela Rice vs Melissa Galloway / Shawn Ridgely2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-09vs GO - HollnagelWon 10
W#3 DoublesPamela Rice / Tatyana Liversedge vs Nicole Jones / Stacey Folsom1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Rebecca Long
published
3.19
3.09
Margarita Posada
published
3.07
Janet Greene
published
3.03
Victoria McClintock
published
2.98
Kim Arcobello
published
2.83
Oksana Velis
published
2.76
Ardis Giddings
published 3
2.74
NANCY TUTEN
published
Pamela Rice
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
Tatyana Liversedge
published
Wanda Simpson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Long
24W–29L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Deborah Borge-Shaffer
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Margarita Posada
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
Janet Greene
26W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.07
Victoria McClintock
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
Kim Arcobello
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.98
Oksana Velis
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Ardis Giddings
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
2.76
NANCY TUTEN
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
Pamela Rice
66W–49L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tatyana Liversedge
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wanda Simpson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.