Teams

McDonald 40+ Summer

2026 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 4.5 Women S26

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-27vs Smiley/Favor '26 (40+)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Dean / Marla Menne vs Lea Blackwell Favor / Linnea Benson6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Esala / Jodi Schley vs Holly Westbrock / Elisabeth Walker7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Fackel / Anna Lyon vs Stacy Katsiyiannis / Shelley Wagener6-3, 6-2
2026-07-20vs Dougan/Weber 40+ SummerWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Dean / Kelly Esala vs Alison Khan / Carol Wahlstrand6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJodi Schley / Laura Keith vs Beci Bjornson / Noelle Dougan6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Mitchell / Kristen Ewers vs Britt Weber / Tzivia Leviton6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-14vs Dougan/Weber 40+ SummerWon 30
W#1 SinglesKristen Ewers vs Sara Ormseth6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Keith / Kelly Esala vs Pamela Moeller / Dana Hansen6-0, 6-4
W#4 DoublesRachel LaTour / Anna Lyon vs Cathy Paper / Brenda Martinson6-0, 6-3
2026-07-06vs Smiley/Favor '26 (40+)Won 40
W#1 DoublesMarla Menne / Jodi Schley vs Ann Eliason / Bernadette McCann6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Keith / Amy Mitchell vs Maura Smiley / Holly Westbrock7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRachel LaTour / Anna Lyon vs Lea Blackwell Favor / Elisabeth Walker6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesChristie Williams / Kelly Fackel vs Stacy Katsiyiannis / Shelley Wagener6-1, 6-4
2026-06-15vs Smiley/Favor '26 (40+)Won 41
W#1 DoublesAmy Dean / Marla Menne vs Meghan Kimber / Maura Smiley6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristen Ewers vs Holly Westbrock6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Esala / Jodi Schley vs Bernadette McCann / Ann Eliason6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAmy Mitchell / Kelly Fackel vs Linnea Benson / Kiersten Miller Anderson0-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesTory Borovsky / Rachel LaTour vs Lea Blackwell Favor / Elisabeth Walker5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-08vs Dougan/Weber 40+ SummerWon 40
W#1 DoublesMarla Menne / Kelly Esala vs Julie Opfer / Noelle Dougan6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMichele Bailey vs Megan Schmidt6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKristen Ewers / Christie Williams vs Tzivia Leviton / Carol Wahlstrand7-6, 6-3
W#4 DoublesRachel LaTour / Kelly Fackel vs Cathy Paper / Brenda Martinson6-1, 6-0
2026-05-18vs Smiley/Favor '26 (40+)Won 40
W#1 DoublesAmy Dean / Marla Menne vs Ann Eliason / Bernadette McCann6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMichele Bailey vs Meghan Kimber7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKristen Ewers / Jodi Schley vs Maura Smiley / Elisabeth Walker6-2, 6-2
W#4 DoublesTory Borovsky / Rachel LaTour vs Shelley Wagener / Missy Swiller6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2026-05-11vs Dougan/Weber 40+ SummerWon 50
W#1 DoublesAmy Dean / Kelly Esala vs Britt Weber / Carol Wahlstrand6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKristen Ewers vs Alison Khan7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMarla Menne / Michele Bailey vs Noelle Dougan / Julie Opfer6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Fackel / Jodi Schley vs Pamela Moeller / Beci Bjornson6-2, 6-1
W#4 DoublesRachel LaTour / Christie Williams vs Cathy Paper / Sara Ormseth6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Women S26
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McDonald 40+ Summer8037314233
2Smiley/Favor '26 (40+)44172350374
3Dougan/Weber 40+ Summer0863468428

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Kelly Esala
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.49
Michele Bailey
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.41
Christie Williams
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.33
Marla Menne
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
4.25
Jodi Schley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
4.24
Kelly Fackel
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
4.24
Kristen Ewers
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.19
Rachel LaTour
usually #4 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
4.05
Laura Keith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Christine Conner
published 4.5
Tory Borovsky
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Esala
17W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
4.80
Michele Bailey
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
4.49
Christie Williams
4W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
4.41
Marla Menne
17W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.33
Jodi Schley
25W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
Kelly Fackel
100W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
Kristen Ewers
16W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
Rachel LaTour
30W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19
Laura Keith
13W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.05
4.5
Christine Conner
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00
Tory Borovsky
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.