Teams

Pinellas/Buckner/55&Over8.0M

2025 Pinellas Adult 55 & Over Weekend Winter · 8.0 M Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-15vs Seminole Lake HuttonWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael MacIntire / Britt Decker vs Gary Hutton / Pierre Lewin6-2, 6-3
2025-03-08vs McMullen King 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesEric Hargrave / Gvozden Dokic vs Albert Alhadeff / Paul Zack7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCHRISTOPHER THOMPSON / William Arfsten vs David King / Martin Black6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJose Alomar / Sylvain Gauthier vs Barney Bailey / Michael Kosloske6-3, 6-4
2025-03-01vs McMullen HollingsworthLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael MacIntire / Britt Decker vs Daren McGovern / Gary Zirbel2-6, 1-6
2025-02-22vs Seminole Lake HuttonWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael MacIntire / Britt Decker vs Chuck Goldberg / Gary Hutton6-3, 6-2
2025-02-01vs Seminole Lake HuttonWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael MacIntire / Britt Decker vs Brian Cooper / Randall Meisner6-3, 7-5
2025-01-19vs McMullen HollingsworthWon 21
W#1 DoublesCHRISTOPHER THOMPSON / William Arfsten vs Ray Pasinski / Peter Newman6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJose Alomar / Sylvain Gauthier vs Steven Rattner / Andrew Newman7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBritt Decker / Fernando Delfino vs Brian Williams / Mark Reagan4-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.83
William Arfsten
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Britt Decker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Jose Alomar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Sylvain Gauthier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Michael MacIntire
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.27
Declan Mansfield
published 3.5
3.06
Robert B Buckner
published
Gvozden Dokic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sylvain Gauthier + Jose Alomar5256% games+5.5% vs expected
Jose Alomar + William Arfsten7158% games−0.7% vs expected
Britt Decker + Michael MacIntire3244% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.06
William Arfsten
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Britt Decker
48W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Jose Alomar
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Sylvain Gauthier
23W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Michael MacIntire
72W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Declan Mansfield
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Robert B Buckner
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Gvozden Dokic
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.