Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE CW5.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 5.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Helen Hartnett
published 3
2.78
Kanika Karu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Jennifer MacDonell
published
2.70
Kim Gavin
published
2.65
Paulina Bettink
published
2.65
Minyu Jessica Chang
published
2.64
Kei Worry
published
2.63
Anne Peters
published
2.62
Mary Low
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Amy Guthrie
published 3
2.57
Laurie Reid
published
2.57
Buffy Afendakis
published 3
2.57
Susan Munne
published
2.55
Charlene Kim
published 3
2.52
Bridget Mcniel
published 3
2.50
Victoria Hata
published
2.48
Mistie Boulton
published
2.32
Whitney Patterson
published
2.15
Katrina Jessop
published
1.98
Kim Burrill
published
Jane Brogna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer DeWinter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Hartnett + Jennifer MacDonell134 matchesnot enough data
Anne Peters + Bridget Mcniel123 matchesnot enough data
Buffy Afendakis + Amy Guthrie033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Helen Hartnett
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.80
Kanika Karu
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
Jennifer MacDonell
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
Kim Gavin
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Paulina Bettink
2W–17L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
Minyu Jessica Chang
2W–15L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
Kei Worry
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
Anne Peters
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.63
Mary Low
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Amy Guthrie
2W–17L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
Laurie Reid
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%29%71%
2.57
3
Buffy Afendakis
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
Susan Munne
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%30%70%
2.57
3
Charlene Kim
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.55
3
Bridget Mcniel
3W–15L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Victoria Hata
10W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%50%50%
2.50
Mistie Boulton
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Whitney Patterson
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.32
Katrina Jessop
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Kim Burrill
7W–20L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Jane Brogna
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer DeWinter
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.