Teams

Fins 3.0 Singles

2024 Pine Belt Singles League · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-10vs Johnson-NorthwoodWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmanda Kirtland vs Jenny Yarbrough6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKaitlyn Hennessey vs Leigh Drummond6-2, 6-1
2024-11-24vs Johnson-NorthwoodWon 21
W#1 SinglesSamantha Jones vs Denise Johnson6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesKennedi Fantroy vs Rebecca Oubre1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesLaura Broussard vs Jenny Yarbrough6-1, 6-3
2024-11-21vs Rounsaville-SportsplexWon 30
W#1 SinglesLaura Broussard vs Melissa Wright6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSamantha Jones vs Kelly Rounsaville6-0, 6-4
W#3 SinglesAmanda Kirtland vs Haley Walley6-0, 6-0
2024-11-19vs Canebrake women 3.0Won 21
L#1 SinglesSamantha Jones vs Allison Radley0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesBrooke Stuart vs Blair Viator6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesLaura Broussard vs Amanda Blankenship6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-11vs Rounsaville-SportsplexWon 30
W#1 SinglesBrooke Stuart vs Kelly Rounsaville6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAmanda Kirtland vs Misty White6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesSamantha Jones vs Kim Blackwell6-0, 6-0
2024-11-03vs Toups 3.0 singlesWon 21
W#1 SinglesLaura Broussard vs Lauren Gonzales6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAmanda Kirtland vs Nicole Toups0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKaitlyn Hennessey vs Amanda Stephens7-6, 6-3
2024-10-29vs Canebrake women 3.0Won 21
L#1 SinglesKaitlyn Hennessey vs Kristen Richardson4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesBrooke Stuart vs Amanda Blankenship6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesSamantha Jones vs Bekah Baugh7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2024-10-21vs Toups 3.0 singlesWon 21
L#1 SinglesSamantha Jones vs Lauren Gonzales4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKaitlyn Hennessey vs Machelle Weeks7-6, 7-5
W#3 SinglesAmanda Kirtland vs Shannon Sims6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amanda Kirtland
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Brooke Stuart
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Samantha Jones
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.92
Laura Broussard
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.71
Kennedi Fantroy
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Kaitlyn Hennessey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kennedi Fantroy + Brooke Stuart314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Kirtland
15W–7L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Brooke Stuart
32W–6L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Samantha Jones
18W–13L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.19
Laura Broussard
29W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
Kennedi Fantroy
30W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Kaitlyn Hennessey
31W–13L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.