Teams

KY/PUR/CLARK

ADULT 55+ WOMEN · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-28vs KY/BG/FaeselLost 12
L#1 DoublesPam Jones / Shawne Seibert vs Sarah Renick / Julie Grothe7-9
W#2 DoublesHeather Gibson / Kellie Steele vs Nazilla Nahid / Janice Allen8-6
L#3 DoublesMitzi Guhy / Rhonda Boone vs Paula Edwards / Janice Belt2-8
2026-03-28vs KY/BG/FaeselWon 21
W#1 DoublesPam Jones / Heather Gibson vs Julie Grothe / Sarah Renick8-4
W#2 DoublesKellie Steele / Shawne Seibert vs Nazilla Nahid / Janice Allen8-5
L#3 DoublesRhonda Boone / Tammy Clark vs Paula Edwards / Janice Belt4-8
2026-03-21vs KY/BG/FaeselWon 21
W#1 DoublesRhonda Boone / Tawnya Hunter vs Sarah Renick / Donna Alderson8-4
W#2 DoublesDenise Grissom / Tammy Clark vs Julie Grothe / Leeann Bailey8-2
L#3 DoublesKellie Steele / Heather Gibson vs Nazilla Nahid / Janice Allen4-8
2026-03-21vs KY/BG/FaeselWon 30
W#1 DoublesRhonda Boone / Tammy Clark vs Julie Grothe / Sarah Renick8-4
W#2 DoublesTawnya Hunter / Denise Grissom vs Leeann Bailey / Donna Alderson8-0
W#3 DoublesMitzi Guhy / Pam Jones vs Paula Edwards / Janice Belt9-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Shawne Seibert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Mitzi Guhy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Tawnya Hunter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Tammy Clark
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Kellie Steele
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Denise Grissom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Rhonda Boone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Pam Jones
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
KIM WILSON
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawne Seibert + Denise Grissom0627% games−6.7% vs expected
Pam Jones + Kellie Steele224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shawne Seibert
40W–86L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Mitzi Guhy
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.90
Tawnya Hunter
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Tammy Clark
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
Kellie Steele
24W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Denise Grissom
15W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
Rhonda Boone
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.63
Pam Jones
17W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
KIM WILSON
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.