Teams

17 MTC 2.5 Singles - Chenevert

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-09vs 3 Chestnut Oaks - Coyle 2.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesCandice Duncan vs Nichole Sands6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSarah Stanley vs Katie Rose6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesBrittney Hackworth vs Heather Waltenbaugh6-4, 6-2
2025-11-03vs 11 ACAC Routree/EaveyWon 30
W#1 SinglesCandice Duncan vs Cynthia Iracane6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesNikki Schurman vs Teresa Ilnicki6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMargie Adcock vs Lisa Rountree6-0, 6-1
2025-10-27vs 9 Rockwood Cove Ladies - MooreWon 30
W#1 SinglesNikki Schurman vs Margaret Moore6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCandice Duncan vs Guo Yu6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesBrittney Hackworth vs Emily Ashton6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSarah Stanley vs Blair Belote6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCandice Duncan vs Julie Sprinkle6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMargie Adcock vs Deborah Mancini6-1, 6-1
2025-10-06vs 12 Willow Oaks 2.5 KaysWon 21
W#1 SinglesSarah Stanley vs Kelli Burnett6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesMargie Adcock vs Janet Dwyer6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesBrittney Hackworth vs Patty Leto Diradour3-6, 2-6
2025-09-29vs 10 ACAC - AdkinsLost 12
L#1 SinglesCandice Duncan vs Jeanne Sarmento5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSarah Stanley vs Taryn Adkins6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesBrittney Hackworth vs Margaret Phipps0-6, 1-6
2025-09-18vs 14 Chestnut Oaks WistWon 21
W#1 SinglesNikki Schurman vs Tatenda Mupfudze6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSarah Stanley vs Valerie Katulka6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesBrittney Hackworth vs Amanda Ayers1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Nikki Schurman
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.70
Dana Chenevert
published 2.5
2.52
Sarah Stanley
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.44
Margie Adcock
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.42
Candice Duncan
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
1.79
Brittney Hackworth
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nikki Schurman + Margie Adcock4165% games+12.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nikki Schurman
26W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%4%96%
2.73
2.5
Dana Chenevert
15W–22L career · no lines in 2025
0%6%94%
2.70
Sarah Stanley
25W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%43%57%
2.52
Margie Adcock
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%69%31%
2.44
3
Candice Duncan
13W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.42
2.5
Brittney Hackworth
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.