Teams

RCCB - Heyn

2022 Brevard Social World Team Tennis · WWT 3.5 Lower April - June

4 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-12vs Fee - WatsonLost 01
L#1 Female SinglesCourtney Thomassen vs Lisa LeDoux5-8
2022-05-21vs TTC - WatsonLost 01
L#1 Female SinglesCourtney Thomassen vs Emily Dwyer3-8
2022-04-30vs TTC - WatsonWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesCourtney Thomassen vs Emily Dwyer8-4
2022-04-23vs Fee - WatsonWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMichele Heyn / Courtney Thomassen vs Trisha Watson / Lisa LeDoux8-4
2022-03-05vs TTC - WatsonWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesPatricia de Simone / Courtney Thomassen vs Emily Dwyer / Linda Fries8-5
2022-02-26Won 10
W#1 Female SinglesCourtney Thomassen vs Carson Brown8-6
2022-02-12Won 10
W#1 Female SinglesCourtney Thomassen vs Lauren Ranew8-1
2022-02-05Won 10
W#1 Female SinglesCourtney Thomassen vs Carson Brown8-3
2022-01-29vs Rockledge - Winner / BarletWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesCourtney Thomassen vs Beatrice Barlet8-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WWT 3.5 Lower April - June have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Courtney Thomassen
usually #1 Female Singles 78%, also #1 Female Doubles 22% · published 4
3.42
Michele Heyn
usually #1 Female Doubles 58%, also #1 Female Singles 42% · published 3.5
3.28
Tee Wells
usually #1 Female Singles 60%, also #1 Female Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Louis Heyn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Heyn + Tee Wells5554% games−2.1% vs expected
Michele Heyn + Courtney Thomassen404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtney Thomassen
65W–45L career · 9 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Michele Heyn
109W–104L career · 19 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Tee Wells
129W–96L career · 10 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Louis Heyn
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.