← Teams

Fee - Norman

2026 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.07 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-31vs EFSC - UrbanLost 0–3
L#1 DoublesBev Wilcocks / Cheryl Toth vs Marielle Earle / Allison Moorhead1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDorota Dembinska / Samantha Swaggerty vs Lisa LeDoux / Karyn Honaker1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBarbra Fortes / Alicia Sucre vs Cyndi Mcdougall / Melissa Lamp0-6, 6-7
2026-08-24vs Kiwi - WyandLost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCheryl Toth / Alicia Sucre vs Anne Ramsey / Kathleen Groff1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Swaggerty / Barbra Fortes vs Allison Wyand / Katie Recker3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGisela Alcalde / Bev Wilcocks vs Tracey Draper / Angila Burke6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2026-08-10vs Fee - RouveyrolWon 2–1
L#1 DoublesBev Wilcocks / Cheryl Toth vs Kimberly Kressler / Milena Alicea3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesColleen Mulryne / Erin O'Brien vs Beth Kalish / Sandra Edwards6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDorota Dembinska / Kelly Norman vs Laura Rouveyrol / Kim Tice1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-03vs Suntree - FordLost 1–2
W#1 DoublesSamantha Swaggerty / Colleen Mulryne vs Mei Kalman / Jennifer Murtha6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBev Wilcocks / Kelly Norman vs Dana Saunders / Anastasia Mika1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBarbra Fortes / Alicia Sucre vs Jill Lyons / Sharon Ford0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Gisela Alcalde
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Erin O'Brien
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Samantha Swaggerty
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published —
2.88
Colleen Mulryne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Barbra Fortes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Dorota Dembinska
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.51
Alicia Sucre
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.46
Kelly Norman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published —
2.35
Bev Wilcocks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbra Fortes + Kelly Norman2–24 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gisela Alcalde
268W–176L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Erin O'Brien
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
—
Samantha Swaggerty
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Colleen Mulryne
22W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Barbra Fortes
4W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Dorota Dembinska
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
2.5
Alicia Sucre
31W–16L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%47%53%
2.51
—
Kelly Norman
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.46
3
Bev Wilcocks
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.