Teams

Team Pan

2022 Loudoun Combo Mixed · Loudoun County Mixed 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-05vs Team FelizLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatie Cummings / Michael McManus vs Sekhar Alluri / Elizabeth Young3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlbert Crenshaw / Freda Moore vs Raman Batish / Sarah Blackwood0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Partlow / Lucy Townsend vs Freddy Feliz / Indre Conners2-6, 2-6
2022-10-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBenny Lam / Catie Cummings vs Debbie Wilson / Thomas Smith7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2022-10-19vs Team FelizWon 10
W#2 DoublesCatie Cummings / Benny Lam vs Melinda Capitano / Adinarayana Kalluru6-3, 7-5
2022-10-16vs Team TriplettSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndre Kettell / Brian Partlow vs Scott Galus / April Rabayda6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCatie Cummings / John Back vs Bill Malloy / Lisa Phaneuf3-6, 0-6
2022-10-15Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAlbert Crenshaw / Freda Moore vs Carolyn Schafer / Neal Boone3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCatie Cummings / John Lovegrove vs Benjamin Butler / Kimberly Sysak1-6, 2-6
2022-10-08vs Team FelizLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndre Kettell / Albert Crenshaw vs Sarah Blackwood / Raman Batish0-6, 3-6
2022-09-22vs Team FelizLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Partlow / Elizabeth Fisher vs Sekhar Alluri / Ayako Doi6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun County Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Brian Partlow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.29
Colleen Gustavson
published 3.5
3.27
Lucy Townsend
published
3.25
Benny Lam
published 3.5
3.18
Frank Pan
published 3.5
3.02
Albert Crenshaw
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Freda Moore
published 3
2.94
Catie Cummings
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.69
Julia Moss
published
2.55
Karen Pantas
published
Michael McManus
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Partlow
104W–31L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
3.5
Colleen Gustavson
1W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Lucy Townsend
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Benny Lam
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Frank Pan
3W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Albert Crenshaw
54W–159L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Freda Moore
36W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.00
3.5
Catie Cummings
59W–105L career · 5 lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.94
Julia Moss
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Karen Pantas
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.55
Michael McManus
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.