Teams

EHTC:String Busters 40+:DeJuan/Santiago

2024 NCT Adult 40 & Over Men · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Men 1

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-02vs RFL:Repeat Performance:Ballentine/Lost 13
L#1 DoublesTod Robberson / Stephen Oppenheim vs Thadd Thomas / Adam Rose6-2, 2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAvneet Singh vs Steven Ballentine6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAngel Santiago / Murali Pemmaraju vs Michael LaTour / Damon Querim1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJOSE DEJUAN / John Henderson vs Ken Camello / Robert Tubridy3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesTod Robberson / John Henderson vs Larry Hunt / Melvin Simon4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAvneet Singh vs Swapan Arora6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJaideep Shenoy / Murali Pemmaraju vs Stephen Aronson / Alan Nathan7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2024-05-11vs BSF:Polhamus/GreenWon 31
L#1 DoublesCarlos Boltes-Palma / Murali Pemmaraju vs Daniel Polhamus / Stephen Jewell2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAvneet Singh vs Sergio Alio6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAngel Santiago / Paul Tetreault vs Vincent Celentano / Alan Lebow6-2, 4-6, 5-3
W#3 DoublesStephen Oppenheim / JOSE DEJUAN vs Lawrence Klobutcher / Michael Bush6-3, 6-2
2024-05-04vs RFL:Repeat Performance:Ballentine/Lost 04
L#1 DoublesSureshbabu Jothimani / Shridhar Prabhu vs Jayme Varao / Tim Davignon5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKhane Moundraty vs Benjamin Hazlin6-7, 6-2, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTod Robberson / Carlos Boltes-Palma vs Peter Zimmerman / Simon Ostrov2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Oppenheim / Angel Santiago vs Michael LaTour / Timothy Larson2-6, 2-6
2024-04-20vs BSF:Polhamus/GreenLost 13
W#1 DoublesSureshbabu Jothimani / Shridhar Prabhu vs Stephen Jewell / Siddhartha Yenugu6-3, 1-6, 5-4
L#1 SinglesKhane Moundraty vs Lutz Labisch2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Henderson / Stephen Oppenheim vs Ian Green / Adam Olson3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarlos Boltes-Palma / JOSE DEJUAN vs Vincent Celentano / Daniel Polhamus6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FV:Valley Racqueteers:Simon/Aronson0581228223
2EHTC:String Busters 40+:DeJuan/Santiago0561430214
3RFL:Repeat Performance:Ballentine/0618619212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Avneet Singh
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Tod Robberson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
John Henderson
published 3.5
3.21
Stephen Oppenheim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Paul Tetreault
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
JOSE DEJUAN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Sureshbabu Jothimani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Angel Santiago
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Carlos Boltes-Palma
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Shridhar Prabhu
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jaideep Shenoy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Khane Moundraty
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Murali Pemmaraju
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sadiq Hasoon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tod Robberson + JOSE DEJUAN2740% games+4.1% vs expected
JOSE DEJUAN + Khane Moundraty8255% games+3.1% vs expected
Paul Tetreault + JOSE DEJUAN6848% games−3.8% vs expected
Paul Tetreault + Tod Robberson6648% games−4.7% vs expected
Paul Tetreault + Angel Santiago2344% gamesnot enough data
Paul Tetreault + Sadiq Hasoon314 matchesnot enough data
Tod Robberson + Khane Moundraty033 matchesnot enough data
Murali Pemmaraju + Carlos Boltes-Palma123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Avneet Singh
32W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Tod Robberson
48W–85L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
John Henderson
no matches on record · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Oppenheim
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Paul Tetreault
78W–113L career · 1 line in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
JOSE DEJUAN
96W–135L career · 3 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
Sureshbabu Jothimani
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Angel Santiago
45W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Carlos Boltes-Palma
15W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
Shridhar Prabhu
15W–34L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Jaideep Shenoy
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Khane Moundraty
96W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Murali Pemmaraju
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sadiq Hasoon
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.