Teams

Duval/Muehl - 1st

2022 Duval Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 55 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesKathleen Pinho / Eugene Kasper vs Kandee Townsend / David Phillips6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDonna Marceau / John Francis Raftery vs Walter Rios / Jaye Andone6-4, 6-4
2022-09-22vs WIlliams Y - GlasgowWon 10
W#1 DoublesArlene Muehl / Tim Davis vs Melissa Glasgow / Robert Glasgow7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJohn Francis Raftery / Kathleen Pinho vs Kraig Hamel / Debra Sutton2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesArlene Muehl / Kenneth Wood vs Thomas Keller / Sheryl Phillips6-2, 6-4
2022-09-11vs WIlliams Y - GlasgowWon 10
W#2 DoublesArlene Muehl / Dennis Lamoureux vs Jennifer Williams / Robert Glasgow6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesKenneth Wood / Arlene Muehl vs Thomas Keller / Sheryl Phillips5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEugene Kasper / Kathleen Pinho vs Matt Hutto / Kandee Townsend4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Francis Raftery / Kelly Groce vs Larry Townsend / Nancy Wentz6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2022-08-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesArlene Muehl / Kenneth Wood vs Kelly Atkins / Bill Stone6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesArlene Muehl / Kenneth Wood vs Larry Townsend / Jaye Andone6-2, 6-1
2022-07-21vs WIlliams Y - GlasgowWon 10
W#1 DoublesEugene Kasper / Kathleen Pinho vs Robert Glasgow / Melissa Glasgow6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Dennis Lamoureux
published 4.5
3.91
Eugene Kasper
published 4
3.64
Kathleen Pinho
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Arlene Muehl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Michael Halusek
published
3.39
Luca Palombi
published
John Francis Raftery
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kenneth Wood
published
Stephanie Carr
published
Tim Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Francis Raftery + Arlene Muehl221453% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dennis Lamoureux
7W–17L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
4
Eugene Kasper
20W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
3.91
Kathleen Pinho
97W–127L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Arlene Muehl
77W–66L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
Michael Halusek
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.43
Luca Palombi
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
John Francis Raftery
79W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kenneth Wood
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Carr
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tim Davis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.