Teams

Walker/40/7.5/CM/CP

2026 NO Southern Combo 40 & Over - Men · 7.5 NO (40&O) Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 9 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
Sep 14 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Scott Walker
Sep 23 6:30 PM
Capitano's Tennis & Athletic Club
Sep 30 6:30 PM
Metairie Country Club
Oct 7 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
2026-09-02vs Miller/40/7.5/CM/CPWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanny Russo / Christopher Taylor vs Kevin Ericksen / John Lindsey6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesErich Weishaupt / Scott Martina vs Jeremy Tuman / Gason Nelson6-1, 6-1
2026-08-26vs Costello/40/7.5/CM/MCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Sanders / Iggy Liriano vs Michael Seaman / Carl Oest-Larsen6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDanny Russo / Jamie Brown vs Rocky Daigle / Dennis Robichaux6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.5 NO (40&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Miller/40/7.5/CM/CP000000
2Legrand/40/7.5/CM/Caps000000
3Walker/40/7.5/CM/CP000000
4Costello/40/7.5/CM/MCC000000
5Bonnet/40/7.5/CM/CP000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Scott Martina
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Henry P Calamari
published
3.71
Danny Russo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Robert Humphreys
published
3.63
Christopher Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.56
Eric Sanders
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Erich Weishaupt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Jamie Brown
published
3.26
Kenneth Humphreys
published
3.24
Jeffrey Bacino
published
3.13
Adam Goldberg
published 3.5
Iggy Liriano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Walker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Taylor + Erich Weishaupt3247% gamesnot enough data
Christopher Taylor + Eric Sanders123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Martina
29W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
Henry P Calamari
22W–20L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Danny Russo
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Robert Humphreys
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Christopher Taylor
19W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.63
Eric Sanders
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
Erich Weishaupt
27W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Jamie Brown
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Kenneth Humphreys
18W–13L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Jeffrey Bacino
16W–25L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Adam Goldberg
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.13
Iggy Liriano
18W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Scott Walker
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.