Teams

Cunningham/FS/CM

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring 2 League · 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-27vs Newby/VB/BGLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristy Williams / Kara Cunningham vs Christine Turpin / Lilli Bartsch0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNaomi Conley / Lauren Lucky vs Audrey Ostrander / Teresa Killough4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAyden Huckelbury vs Emily Barr2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-20vs Newby/VB/BGWon 32
W#1 DoublesNaomi Conley / Britney Taake vs Kim Wohlford / Tami Martin6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAyden Huckelbury vs Emily Barr6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristy Williams / Kara Cunningham vs Sara Cunningham / Teresa Brooks4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJoanna Ayala vs Lilli Bartsch7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLauren Lucky / Melissa Richmond vs Audrey Ostrander / Jessica Morgan2-6, 2-6
2026-04-14vs Newby/VB/BGLost 13
L#1 DoublesPayton Goins / Jill Holmes vs Sara Cunningham / Audrey Ostrander0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAyden Huckelbury / Christy Williams vs Kim Newby / Melissa Chavez4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesKara Cunningham vs Abigail Woodring2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesNaomi Conley / Joanna Ayala vs Teresa Killough / Teresa Brooks6-2, 6-2
2026-03-30vs Newby/VB/BGLost 14
W#1 DoublesNaomi Conley / Lisa Huckelbury vs Kim Newby / Teresa Killough7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAyden Huckelbury vs Lilli Bartsch1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPayton Goins / Emillie Vick vs Kim Wohlford / Abigail Woodring6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBritney Taake vs Emily Barr2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristy Williams / Lauren Lucky vs Sara Cunningham / Lora Smith3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-12vs Newby/VB/BGLost 13
L#1 SinglesLauren Lucky vs Lora Smith5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKara Cunningham / Jill Holmes vs Sara Cunningham / Audrey Ostrander2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesNaomi Conley vs Emily Barr2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoanna Ayala / Sara Adair vs Christine Turpin / Tami Martin0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Newby/VB/BG4118717155
2Cunningham/FS/CM1471838271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Ayden Huckelbury
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Lauren Lucky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.47
Naomi Conley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.43
Kara Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.42
Jill Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Britney Taake
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.22
Sara Adair
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.17
Joanna Ayala
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.16
Lisa Huckelbury
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Emillie Vick
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Lisa Grace
published
Payton Goins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emillie Vick + Britney Taake8362% games+15.9% vs expected
Sara Adair + Joanna Ayala13164% games+9.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ayden Huckelbury
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Lauren Lucky
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
Naomi Conley
7W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Kara Cunningham
10W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.43
Jill Holmes
41W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Britney Taake
20W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
Sara Adair
22W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Joanna Ayala
26W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Lisa Huckelbury
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.16
Emillie Vick
14W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Lisa Grace
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Payton Goins
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.