Teams

FREMONT TC 18MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-15vs PLEASANTON 18MX7.0BWon 10
W#3 DoublesSwina Sapkota / Nimesh Gandhi vs Ann del Rio / Jason Ehrlich6-2, 6-1
2025-02-22vs BAY CLUB PL 18MX7.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesNimesh Gandhi / Bonnie Chamchawee vs Henry Chung / Hui Xie7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Daniel Kroes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Evan Wong
published
3.63
Paul Kwon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Mai Pham
published
3.60
Bonnie Chamchawee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.58
Bill Wei
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.57
Yemia Hashimoto
published
3.48
Sekar Mokachandra
published
3.40
Diem Nguyen
published 3.5
3.37
Haewon Kwon
published
3.36
Nimesh Gandhi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Alicia Barco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Ruby Sioson
published
3.30
Ieda Garcia
published
3.25
Edison Barco
published
3.20
Swina Sapkota
published
3.15
Chihiro Tajima
published 3.5
3.06
Lou Salvador
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ellen Xiao
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alicia Barco + Nimesh Gandhi7453% gamesnot enough data
Yemia Hashimoto + Daniel Kroes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Kroes
21W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Evan Wong
20W–14L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Paul Kwon
24W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.63
Mai Pham
37W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Bonnie Chamchawee
83W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Bill Wei
29W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
Yemia Hashimoto
37W–35L career · no lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Sekar Mokachandra
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Diem Nguyen
26W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Haewon Kwon
44W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Nimesh Gandhi
147W–82L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Alicia Barco
78W–66L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Ruby Sioson
14W–24L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Ieda Garcia
51W–38L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Edison Barco
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Swina Sapkota
23W–17L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Chihiro Tajima
4W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Lou Salvador
28W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.06
Ellen Xiao
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.