Teams

Romero Grand Slammers

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 3.0 WOMEN

16 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-21vs Knoch-Dohlin: Tennis the MenanceWon 41
W#1 DoublesJane Bailey / Jill Kohler vs Kathleen Danner / Kelly Vegoe6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMichele Franchett vs Gina Shuck2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEllen Anderson / Kate Segler vs Megan Knoch-Dohlin / Rana Khoury6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAnita Hruby vs Kayla Malik7-5, 4-0
L#3 DoublesDebbie Romero / Susan Clingman vs Jennifer Ericson / Astrid Knott3-6, 2-6
2024-11-14vs Macariola: Tough LoveLost 03
L#1 DoublesGita Ghei / Anita Sukur vs Maria Annette MacAriola / Rachel Johnson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAnita Hruby vs Corazon Fos4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDebbie Romero / Teresa Ripple vs Adona Rabago / Maria Cecilia Ray2-6, 4-6
2024-10-17vs Knoch-Dohlin: Tennis the MenanceWon 30
W#1 DoublesWendy Bloom / Jill Kohler vs Emily Vegoe / Kelly Vegoe6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichele Franchett / Ellen Anderson vs Gina Shuck / Rana Khoury4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAnita Sukur vs Kathleen Danner6-7, 5-5
2024-10-10vs Macariola: Tough LoveLost 14
L#1 DoublesWendy Bloom / Betsi Brock vs Bernadette MacKey / Rachel Johnson1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesGita Ghei vs KJ Madison1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Clingman / Jane Bailey vs Jessica Maurer / Marie Stodolka6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMichele Franchett vs Lisa Andreasen6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDebbie Romero / Anita Hruby vs Adona Rabago / Jennie Szorcsik0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Jodie Korinek
published
2.89
Kate Segler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Anita Sukur
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.82
Jill Kohler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Michele Franchett
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.69
Ellen Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Stephanie Downs
published
2.59
Gita Ghei
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Anita Hruby
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Debbie Romero
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.02
Sarah Sand
published
1.96
Susan Clingman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Betsi Brock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tamara Block
published
Teresa Ripple
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Wendy Bloom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Anderson + Kate Segler4646% games−4.1% vs expected
Jill Kohler + Wendy Bloom123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jodie Korinek
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Kate Segler
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.89
3
Anita Sukur
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Jill Kohler
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Michele Franchett
18W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Ellen Anderson
19W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Stephanie Downs
12W–18L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Gita Ghei
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
2.59
2.5
Anita Hruby
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Debbie Romero
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Sand
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Susan Clingman
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Betsi Brock
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tamara Block
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Ripple
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Bloom
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.