Teams

BROADSTONE RC CW5.5A

2023 COMBO · Women 5.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Jinny Beaton-Le
published
3.17
Jennefer Asperheim
published
3.12
Juliana Long
published
3.12
Lindsay Ingham
published
3.04
Kristina Houston
published
3.02
Rose Lunsmann
published
2.88
Melody Andaya
published
2.88
Sherri Coleman
published
2.85
STEPHANIE BERRY
published
2.82
Susan Manger
published
2.82
Deborah Bickel
published 3
2.77
Kim Vargas
published
2.74
Laura Bardini
published
2.74
2.64
Diane Rodes
published 3
2.60
Debbie Duncan
published 3
2.37
Lisa Reese
published
2.16
Linda Hayman
published
Jennifer Aguirre
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juliana Long + Rose Lunsmann224 matchesnot enough data
Laura Bardini + Juliana Long213 matchesnot enough data
Susan Manger + Deborah Bickel303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jinny Beaton-Le
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Jennefer Asperheim
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%12%88%
3.17
Juliana Long
18W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%20%80%
3.12
Lindsay Ingham
21W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.12
Kristina Houston
18W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.04
Rose Lunsmann
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02
Melody Andaya
19W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%20%
2.88
Sherri Coleman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
STEPHANIE BERRY
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
2.85
Susan Manger
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Deborah Bickel
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
2.82
Kim Vargas
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
Laura Bardini
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Ann Huntley-Garcia
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Diane Rodes
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Debbie Duncan
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
2.60
Lisa Reese
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
0%83%17%
2.37
Linda Hayman
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.16
Jennifer Aguirre
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.