Teams

Buckhorn Lobstars - C. Sullivan

2023 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.88 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesSara Newsom / Melissa Wolczak vs Patience Wood / Jessica Mathews6-3, 6-3
2023-05-12vs Carrollwood 40+ - B. KuntzWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Stuart / Renee Rasmussen vs Becky Kuntz / Erika Sumner6-3, 7-5
2023-05-06vs TYCC Party at the Net - M. JamesWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Wolczak / Sara Newsom vs Molly James / Susanna Bray6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesChristina Sullivan / Andrea Stuart vs Ashley Kirkham / Hedy Yuan Hou6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSara Newsom / Andrea Stuart vs Lisa Pascoli / Ann Johnston6-2, 6-2
2023-04-07vs Plant City Deuces - J. KosarWon 10
W#1 SinglesSara Newsom vs Shannon Tompkins5-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Melissa Collier
published
2.97
Andrea Stuart
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
2.88
Melissa Wolczak
published
2.73
2.73
Sara Newsom
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Silvia Cuevas
published
2.53
Renee Rasmussen
published
2.47
Jackie Lindemulder
published
Beth Larson
published 2.5
2.21
Michelle Graba
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Sullivan + Andrea Stuart7453% games+6.1% vs expected
Andrea Stuart + Sara Newsom6558% games+1.3% vs expected
Christina Sullivan + Sara Newsom2738% games+0.1% vs expected
Silvia Cuevas + Jackie Lindemulder404 matchesnot enough data
Renee Rasmussen + Jackie Lindemulder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Collier
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Andrea Stuart
103W–100L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Christina Sullivan
19W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.93
Melissa Wolczak
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
Maria Karina Espinoza
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Sara Newsom
83W–79L career · 8 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Silvia Cuevas
20W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%14%86%
2.65
Renee Rasmussen
11W–19L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
2.53
Jackie Lindemulder
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%58%42%
2.47
2.5
Beth Larson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Graba
10W–17L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.21
Marta Rodriguez Lopez
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.