Teams

BHatfield (Palisades)

2022 Singles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Singles 4.0 Men - Tues PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-02Won 10
W#2 SinglesKeith Gonzales vs Timothy Ellis6-2, 6-0
2022-07-26vs BCudney (Jeff Adams)Split 11
W#2 SinglesKeith Gonzales vs Ched Hargett6-4, 7-6
L#3 SinglesBrian Hatfield vs Chris Mullis4-6, 2-6
2022-07-22Won 20
W#1 SinglesKeith Gonzales vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBrian Hatfield vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-12vs BHofmann/RGum (Life Time)Split 11
L#2 SinglesKeith Gonzales vs Kyle Williams4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesBrian Hatfield vs Jean-Paul Schoubert6-1, 6-1
2022-06-28vs AMontemayor (Life Time)Won 20
W#2 SinglesKeith Gonzales vs William Krueger6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesBrian Hatfield vs Timothy Ellis6-4, 6-2
2022-06-21vs BCudney (Jeff Adams)Split 11
W#1 SinglesKeith Gonzales vs Chip Ashley6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesBrian Hatfield vs Peter Karlsson4-6, 6-7
2022-06-14vs DPatel (Blakeney)Won 20
W#1 SinglesKeith Gonzales vs Phillip Osborne6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesBrian Hatfield vs David Bartholomew6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-07Won 10
W#2 SinglesKeith Gonzales vs Kyle Williams4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Singles 4.0 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Don Nelson
published 4
3.55
Brian Hatfield
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.48
Keith Gonzales
usually #2 Singles 63%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 4
3.39
Estil Strawn
published 3.5
Chris Christopher
published
Steve Yager
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keith Gonzales + Brian Hatfield31138% games−5.0% vs expected
Keith Gonzales + Estil Strawn033 matchesnot enough data
Brian Hatfield + Estil Strawn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Don Nelson
71W–40L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Brian Hatfield
65W–73L career · 6 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Keith Gonzales
45W–62L career · 8 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Estil Strawn
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.39
Chris Christopher
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Steve Yager
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.