Teams

HILLS/Cotey

2026 Hillsborough Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-31vs Sun City Center /AstoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne-Lucie Bouchard / Randall Smith vs Neal Peterson / Marie Yaghoobian6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTibbie Farnsworth / Kevin Wang vs Joe Izzo / Linda Taylor7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSean Friday / Janene Culumber vs Mark Nelson / Yvonne Wigg6-1, 6-3
2026-05-17vs Sun City Center /AstoneSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Cotey / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Bob Astone / Paige Lowery-Haggbloom4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChristopher Baker / Janene Culumber vs Mark Nelson / Yvonne Wigg6-1, 7-6
2026-05-10vs Sun City Center /AstoneWon 21
L#1 DoublesRandall Smith / Anne-Lucie Bouchard vs Bob Astone / Paige Lowery-Haggbloom4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSean Friday / Danna Sturman vs Henry Gales / Christine Lansing6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMichael Dasilva / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Mark Nelson / Marie Yaghoobian6-2, 6-2
2026-05-03vs Sun City Center /AstoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Dasilva / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Bob Astone / Edna Carlin6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJanene Culumber / Chris Burdge vs Mark Nelson / Linda Taylor6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDanna Sturman / John Cotey vs Neal Peterson / Yvonne Wigg6-3, 6-2
2026-04-26vs Sun City Center /AstoneWon 21
W#1 DoublesFan Wang / Ian Zhang vs Bob Astone / Paige Lowery-Haggbloom4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Dasilva / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Neal Peterson / Leslie Morgan4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKevin Wang / Margaret Filbert vs Henry Gales / Christine Lansing4-6, 2-6
2026-04-19vs Sun City Center /AstoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesRandall Smith / Anne-Lucie Bouchard vs Bob Astone / Edna Carlin6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSean Friday / Fan Wang vs Neal Peterson / Christine Lansing6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTibbie Farnsworth / Ian Zhang vs Joe Izzo / Marie Yaghoobian6-3, 6-0
2026-04-12vs Sun City Center /AstoneWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristopher Baker / Danna Sturman vs Bob Astone / Paige Lowery-Haggbloom1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChris Burdge / Janene Culumber vs Joe Izzo / Marie Yaghoobian6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichael Dasilva / Margaret Filbert vs Henry Gales / Leslie Morgan7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Anne-Lucie Bouchard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Fan Wang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Christopher Baker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Chris Burdge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Tibbie Farnsworth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Danna Sturman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Sean Friday
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Ian Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Janene Culumber
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.93
Randall Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Elizabeth Dasilva
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Margaret Filbert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Cotey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Dasilva
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Dasilva + Michael Dasilva8264% gamesnot enough data
Michael Dasilva + Margaret Filbert5071% gamesnot enough data
Ian Zhang + Fan Wang404 matchesnot enough data
Randall Smith + Anne-Lucie Bouchard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne-Lucie Bouchard
30W–14L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
Fan Wang
32W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Christopher Baker
16W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Chris Burdge
15W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Tibbie Farnsworth
209W–139L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Danna Sturman
15W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Sean Friday
13W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Ian Zhang
17W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Janene Culumber
67W–70L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.17
Randall Smith
15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
Elizabeth Dasilva
115W–108L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92
Margaret Filbert
40W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
John Cotey
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Dasilva
81W–66L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.