Teams

1 ACAC Callaghan/Granger

2022 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.21 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-09vs 8 Bon Air PowersWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Knick / Alice Albright vs Donna Lawson / Jennifer Moss6-0, 6-0
2022-07-02vs 6 KRA Bald Berrettini BabesWon 10
W#1 DoublesStacy McLeod / Martinique Kandl vs Laura Pleasants / Anne Walker6-4, 6-3
2022-06-12vs 7 Westwood Stanley/FittsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlicia Zatcoff / Martinique Kandl vs Kirstine Wilson / Donna Dean6-1, 6-3
2022-06-11vs 9 Willow Oaks CatherinesWon 10
W#1 DoublesNikki Callaghan / Mary Knick vs Catherine Matawaran / Anne Scher6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Martinique Kandl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Mary Knick
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Anne Townsend
published 3.5
3.26
Stacy McLeod
published
3.23
Nikki Callaghan
published
2.94
Cecilia Bergh
published 3
2.79
Abbe Voigt
published 3
2.75
Jane Parrish
published
Alice Albright
published 3
2.72
Taryn Giroux
published
2.68
Kristin Gray
published
2.66
Jackie Granger
published 3
Katy Bassler
published
Peggy Bel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abbe Voigt + Jackie Granger303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Martinique Kandl
167W–65L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Mary Knick
204W–130L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Anne Townsend
33W–23L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Stacy McLeod
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Nikki Callaghan
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Cecilia Bergh
16W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Abbe Voigt
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
Jane Parrish
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.75
3
Alice Albright
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Taryn Giroux
16W–11L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
Kristin Gray
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Jackie Granger
20W–14L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
Katy Bassler
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Peggy Bel
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.