Teams

MC NAVY

2026 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

9 players · average NTRP 3.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-28vs NJ YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrea Salzberg / Pamela Catalano vs Pamela Johnstone / Kerry Mobley3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Strauss / Sharon Dahlquist vs Rachel Eng / Lisa Kellogg2-6, 1-6
2026-07-21vs RHCC YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrea Salzberg / Patricia Demers vs Kirstin McConnell / Bryn Marsh5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAna Bland / Sharon Dahlquist vs Susan Weese / Madeleine Futterman0-6, 5-7
2026-07-14vs HIW ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesPamela Catalano / Lisa Pomerantz vs Laura Billups / Lindsey Strickler2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJolein Harro vs Mieke Scripps2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAna Bland / Claudia Perales vs Deirdre Brigham / Reid Thompson5-7, 4-6
2026-07-07vs NJ YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesPamela Catalano / Linda Strauss vs Katie Keighley / Tara Hammar1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJolein Harro vs Lisa Kellogg6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Pomerantz / Andrea Salzberg vs April DeLauro / Kerry Mobley4-6, 3-6
2026-06-30vs RHCC YELLOWLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatricia Demers / Andrea Salzberg vs Valerie VanAlsburg / Bryn Marsh3-2, 0-0
L#1 SinglesJolein Harro vs Jaclyn Tracy2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Wilson / Lisa Pomerantz vs Shannen Major / Susan Weese2-6, 0-6
2026-06-23vs HIW ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesClaudia Perales / Sharon Dahlquist vs Mieke Scripps / Nicole Reyes1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Strauss / Kelly Wilson vs Lindsey Strickler / Jill Bader3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Patricia Demers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Jolein Harro
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Andrea Salzberg
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Sharon Dahlquist
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Pamela Catalano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Ana Bland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Lisa Pomerantz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Claudia Perales
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Linda Strauss
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Bland + Claudia Perales2449% games+8.4% vs expected
Pamela Catalano + Patricia Demers4348% games−3.3% vs expected
Ana Bland + Pamela Catalano51244% games−11.9% vs expected
Ana Bland + Patricia Demers3257% gamesnot enough data
Jolein Harro + Pamela Catalano134 matchesnot enough data
Claudia Perales + Pamela Catalano033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Patricia Demers
94W–94L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Jolein Harro
48W–69L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Andrea Salzberg
4W–10L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Sharon Dahlquist
27W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Pamela Catalano
66W–101L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Ana Bland
87W–109L career · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
Lisa Pomerantz
34W–100L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Claudia Perales
29W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
3.5
Linda Strauss
16W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.