Teams

Fred Wells Gordon 10:30am

2026 Woman's Daytime Singles · 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-09vs Williston Gonikman 11:30amWon 51
W#1 SinglesMichele Blanch vs Lisa Gordon6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesRory Osberg vs Doreen Remington3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesElisabeth Johnson vs Jessica Stone6-3, 5-4
W#4 SinglesCathy Paper vs Susan Patterson6-3, 6-1
W#5 SinglesJamie Lukehart-Hobbs vs Susanna Ferlito6-2, 6-3
W#6 SinglesDina Wolkoff vs Jennifer Kuhlmann1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-23vs MTC Setts 12:00pmWon 60
W#1 SinglesElisabeth Johnson vs Andrea McHugh7-6, 3-1
W#2 SinglesSarah Twedt vs Ashley Bykowski6-3, 4-4
W#3 SinglesSarah Curfman vs Jaime Pellegrene6-3, 4-6
W#4 SinglesRory Osberg vs Stephanie Harlan6-2, 6-1
W#5 SinglesJamie Lukehart-Hobbs vs Mary Kennedy7-5, 5-3
W#6 SinglesMolly Rarig vs Carrie Stolar6-1, 5-6
2026-02-09vs ICT Hanson 1:30pmWon 42
W#1 SinglesMichele Blanch vs Nancy Kelly6-4, 3-4
W#2 SinglesRory Osberg vs Laura Stromgren7-5, 3-3
W#3 SinglesElisabeth Johnson vs Emily Koenig6-7, 2-0
L#4 SinglesJamie Lukehart-Hobbs vs Alison Cook2-6, 5-5
L#5 SinglesMolly Rarig vs Lauren Bralski1-6, 2-6
W#6 SinglesAngel Chandler vs Janet Nauman6-4, 3-4
W#1 SinglesMichele Blanch vs Meghan Scelfo6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesElisabeth Johnson vs Tina Mcalpine6-2, 4-4
W#3 SinglesJamie Lukehart-Hobbs vs Karen Heyer-Liljedahl6-2, 6-2
W#4 SinglesRory Osberg vs Margaret Creighton6-2, 6-1
W#5 SinglesSarah Curfman vs YI-WEN YANG6-2, 6-3
W#6 SinglesMolly Rarig vs Amanda Olson6-3, 6-2
2026-02-01vs MTC Setts 12:00pmWon 32
W#1 SinglesRory Osberg vs Andrea McHugh7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCathy Paper vs Suzanne Ross6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesSarah Twedt vs Jaime Pellegrene2-6, 6-4
W#4 SinglesJamie Lukehart-Hobbs vs Ashley Bykowski6-3, 6-6
L#5 SinglesMolly Rarig vs Heather Flies3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-12-08vs LT Eden Prairie Elsass 11:00amWon 51
W#1 SinglesMichele Blanch vs Lindsay Ruppert6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesRory Osberg vs Kirsten Gregerson6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesCathy Paper vs Susan Fannon3-0
W#4 SinglesSarah Twedt vs Sarah Murphy6-1, 6-2
W#5 SinglesJamie Lukehart-Hobbs vs Rachel Lund7-6, 4-4
L#6 SinglesSarah Curfman vs Amy Gammill3-6, 4-6
2025-11-10vs ICT Hanson 1:30pmLost 23
L#1 SinglesMichele Blanch vs Lindsay Dean5-7, 3-3
L#3 SinglesSarah Curfman vs Lauren Bralski1-6, 4-6
W#4 SinglesRory Osberg vs Laura Stromgren5-7, 6-3
L#5 SinglesJamie Lukehart-Hobbs vs Nancy Kelly6-4, 2-5
W#6 SinglesMolly Rarig vs Janet Nauman6-3, 6-1
2025-10-13vs Williston Gonikman 11:30amSplit 33
W#1 SinglesMichele Blanch vs Doreen Remington6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesSarah Curfman vs Jessica Stone6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesDina Wolkoff vs Lydia Crouser2-6, 0-6
W#4 SinglesJamie Lukehart-Hobbs vs Megan Twito6-1, 6-2
L#5 SinglesMolly Rarig vs Lisa Gordon3-6, 3-6
W#6 SinglesSarah Muellenberg vs Sue Woodrich6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-29vs LT White Bear Lake Kolenich 11:30amSplit 33
W#1 SinglesRory Osberg vs Margaret Creighton6-4, 3-3
W#2 SinglesMichele Blanch vs Chanda Cook6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesSarah Curfman vs Amanda Olson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#4 SinglesCathy Paper vs Meghan Scelfo6-7, 2-4
L#5 SinglesJamie Lukehart-Hobbs vs Tina Mcalpine2-6, 3-6
L#6 SinglesSarah Muellenberg vs Karen Heyer-Liljedahl3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Elisabeth Johnson
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.98
Michele Blanch
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
3.83
Cathy Paper
usually #4 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.82
Sarah Twedt
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.81
Rory Osberg
usually #4 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
3.62
Johanna Gennrich
published
3.55
Jamie Lukehart-Hobbs
usually #5 Singles 50%, also #4 Singles 30% · published 4
3.47
Sarah Curfman
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 30% · published
3.46
Angel Chandler
usually #2 Singles 62%, also #4 Singles 15% · published 3.5
3.40
Molly Rarig
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #6 Singles 25% · published
3.36
Sarah Muellenberg
usually #5 Singles 39%, also #6 Singles 23% · published
3.36
Dina Wolkoff
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Lukehart-Hobbs + Molly Rarig303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elisabeth Johnson
13W–3L career · type D · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.12
Michele Blanch
47W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Cathy Paper
45W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
Sarah Twedt
33W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
Rory Osberg
46W–21L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Johanna Gennrich
15W–26L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.62
4
Jamie Lukehart-Hobbs
27W–35L career · 10 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Sarah Curfman
58W–43L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Angel Chandler
55W–32L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
Molly Rarig
21W–9L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.40
Sarah Muellenberg
19W–12L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Dina Wolkoff
26W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.