Teams

PD18/Weinberg/PTC

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over - PD · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-13vs PD18/INGRAM/BYPWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Lynn Lee / Elena Claus vs Brandi Davis / Julia Rowland6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJessica Weinberg vs Rachel Ingram6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPamela Weinberg / Pamela Cody vs Rebecca Anderson / Julie Strange6-2, 7-6
2026-03-31vs PD18/Braddock/HCCWon 31
W#1 DoublesJessica Weinberg / Pamela Cody vs Lynda Owens / Jane Ponder6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHolly McCabe vs Tatum Warr6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSharlyne Battle / Angelan Johnston Gomillion vs Terrie Reames / Rebecca Ivie6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesOlga Pak vs Rashmi Anki2-6, 0-6
2026-03-24vs PD 3.0W 18 & Over (Wightman)Lost 14
L#1 DoublesMary Lynn Lee / Elena Claus vs Regie Genete / Haixia Xi5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesHolly McCabe vs Alanna Phillips4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Weinberg / Pamela Cody vs Haley Wightman / Helen Carroll3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesJessica Weinberg vs Maria Wells4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSharlyne Battle / Allison Turner vs Teresa Cheng / Ning Wharton3-6, 2-6
2026-03-17vs PD18/Pittard/FTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesElena Claus / Sarah Scott vs Jessica Pittard / Celeste Wearing6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHolly McCabe vs Rachel Lane6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAllison Turner / Pamela Cody vs Barbara Ellen Griffin / Robin Hanson6-0, 6-2
2026-03-10vs PD18/INGRAM/BYPWon 41
W#1 DoublesPamela Cody / Mary Lynn Lee vs April Crawley / Margaret Beasley6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesHolly McCabe vs Julia Rowland6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAllison Turner / Jenny Thigpen vs Rachel Ingram / Brandi Davis5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJessica Weinberg vs Misty Lee7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPamela Weinberg / Linda Freeman vs Anita Crawford / Jennifer Webb6-4, 6-3
2026-02-24vs PD18/Braddock/HCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesAngelan Johnston Gomillion / Allison Turner vs Susan Brown / Dusty Braddock7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJessica Weinberg vs Tatum Warr5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPamela Cody / Linda Freeman vs Terrie Reames / Jane Ponder6-0, 7-5
2026-02-14vs PD 3.0W 18 & Over (Wightman)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesJessica Weinberg / Mary Lynn Lee vs Regie Genete / Haixia Xi2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesHolly McCabe vs Kelli McGregor6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJenny Thigpen / Allison Turner vs Haley Wightman / Helen Carroll1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Weinberg / Pamela Cody vs Ashley Lide / Teresa Cheng1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-02-07vs PD18/Pittard/FTCWon 40
W#1 DoublesSharlyne Battle / Allison Turner vs Jessica Pittard / Danisha Patel6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJessica Weinberg vs Summer Sibley6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJill McMillan / Linda Freeman vs Laura Anne Hofler / Skylar Jones6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPamela Weinberg / Pamela Cody vs Robin Hanson / Caroline Blaker6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Pamela Cody
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.84
Elena Claus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Pamela Weinberg
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.81
Jill McMillan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Linda Freeman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Jessica Weinberg
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.69
Holly McCabe
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.64
Sandy Trexler
published
2.63
Angelan Johnston Gomillion
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.45
Jenny Thigpen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Sharlyne Battle
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
1.93
Olga Pak
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Weinberg + Pamela Cody16462% games−2.4% vs expected
Pamela Weinberg + Jill McMillan6253% games−7.4% vs expected
Linda Freeman + Pamela Weinberg224 matchesnot enough data
Elena Claus + Pamela Cody224 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Trexler + Linda Freeman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Cody
45W–23L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Elena Claus
16W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Pamela Weinberg
39W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Jill McMillan
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
Linda Freeman
20W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Jessica Weinberg
23W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Holly McCabe
11W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Sandy Trexler
16W–17L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Angelan Johnston Gomillion
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
Jenny Thigpen
8W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45
Sharlyne Battle
14W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44
Olga Pak
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.