Teams

KY/LOU/AFTENIE

2023 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 4.5 Women

19 players · average NTRP 4.25 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Dolores Jones
published 4.5
4.13
Livia Aftenie
published
4.11
Shelley Nelson
published
4.02
Tanika Taylor
published
3.96
Sarah Keith
published
3.85
Erica Rust
published 4
3.82
Jody Shaikun
published
3.77
Stacie Grossfeld
published
3.67
Wendy Knabel
published
3.63
Shannon Williams
published
3.58
Janet Brumley
published
3.55
Jennifer Ottman
published
3.48
Jane St Clair
published
3.46
Sarah Wartschlager
published
3.38
Meg Shonkwiler
published
3.19
Jean Sims
published
3.11
Vicki Rogers
published
Marisol Sander
published
Rita Matanich
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jody Shaikun + Shannon Williams4262% games+9.9% vs expected
Stacie Grossfeld + Shannon Williams4250% games+1.8% vs expected
Dolores Jones + Livia Aftenie7253% games+1.8% vs expected
Shannon Williams + Janet Brumley3245% games+1.4% vs expected
Livia Aftenie + Jody Shaikun4258% gamesnot enough data
Stacie Grossfeld + Jody Shaikun3253% gamesnot enough data
Jane St Clair + Livia Aftenie224 matchesnot enough data
Marisol Sander + Shannon Williams404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dolores Jones
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
4.15
Livia Aftenie
66W–47L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
4.13
Shelley Nelson
23W–27L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.11
Tanika Taylor
12W–13L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
4.02
Sarah Keith
32W–34L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Erica Rust
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
Jody Shaikun
48W–34L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.82
Stacie Grossfeld
22W–29L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
3.77
Wendy Knabel
12W–21L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
Shannon Williams
38W–29L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.63
Janet Brumley
27W–31L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Jennifer Ottman
47W–68L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.55
Jane St Clair
55W–58L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
Sarah Wartschlager
23W–30L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.46
Meg Shonkwiler
31W–17L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.38
Jean Sims
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
3.19
Vicki Rogers
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Marisol Sander
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rita Matanich
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.