Teams

Hocker/Lawing/Nashville

2025 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women - FRI AM

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-02vs Lee/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesKelly Stanley / Caroline Weigel vs Joni Lee / Janie Omer3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Hocker / Lauren Cannon vs Stephanie Gillmor / Eileen Smith3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLluvia Contaldo / Katie Warren vs Lisa Jagar / Jill Porter7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesKim Keyes / Ellen Hollis vs Kate Elasy / Amy Robbins2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-04-25vs Glennon/Boyce/NashvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelly Stanley / Erin Cabell vs Lea Ann Sexton / Laura Miller6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLauren Cannon / Suzanne Lawing vs Jennifer Brinks / Kathy Logan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Hocker / Caroline Weigel vs Lauren Boyce / Lynne Welch5-7, 1-6
W#4 DoublesCourtney Conklin / Kate Mikes vs Ceri Hoover / Anne Rogers2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-18vs Phillips/Hollomon/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesRuthann Ross / Christy Sykes vs Trish James / Anne Jenkins4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCourtney Conklin vs Jennifer Elzen0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKate Mikes / Kelly Stanley vs Susan Gorney / Caroline Browder4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSamantha Reedy / Kim Keyes vs Kim Bright / Kim McRae3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#4 DoublesKatie Warren / Lauren Hocker vs Jacqueline Phillips / Meredith Hollomon6-4, 7-5
2025-04-11vs Schneider/Vestevich/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesCindy Denson / Kate Mikes vs Shalini Rose / Kelly Montgomery4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Snider / Caroline Weigel vs Suzanne Camping / Heather Gipson3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Lawing / Ellen Hollis vs Shannon McWaters / Lissa Vestevich3-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesRachel Stevenson / Courtney Conklin vs Angelique Hopper / Paige Patton0-6, 0-6
2025-03-28vs Shalkevich/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Lawing / Lauren Hocker vs Tanya Petrucha / Cindy Lee4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKim Keyes vs Leslie Willmore2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Snider / Rachel Stevenson vs April Bosse / Ann Kehayes2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCindy Denson / Ruthann Ross vs Doreen Caputo / Samantha Santilli6-3, 6-3
L#4 DoublesKelly Stanley / Caroline Weigel vs Susan Taylor / Stacia Vyneman6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-03-21vs Ossman/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesKim Keyes / Caroline Weigel vs Nancy Russell / Katrena Miller2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Cannon / Lauren Hocker vs Sara Gibbs / Thalia Kahl3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKelly Stanley / Suzanne Lawing vs Joy Helton / Tonia Porter3-6, 5-7
L#4 DoublesEllen Hollis / Ali Peace vs Kerri Frye / Susan Manley0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Ruthann Ross
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Kate Mikes
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Kelly Stanley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.04
Suzanne Lawing
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Lluvia Contaldo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Christy Sykes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Cindy Denson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Ali Peace
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Lauren Hocker
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
Caroline Weigel
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 3
Courtney Conklin
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.73
Jessica McLean
published
2.73
Ellen Hollis
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Erin Cabell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jessica Snider
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Keyes
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Lawing + Lauren Hocker1434% games−6.8% vs expected
Suzanne Lawing + Kelly Stanley2346% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Hollis + Ali Peace314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ruthann Ross
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Kate Mikes
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Kelly Stanley
8W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Suzanne Lawing
10W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Lluvia Contaldo
20W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Christy Sykes
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Cindy Denson
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Ali Peace
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Lauren Hocker
17W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Caroline Weigel
0W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Courtney Conklin
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica McLean
7W–0L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Ellen Hollis
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Erin Cabell
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Snider
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Keyes
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.