Teams

GR-Taylor (18s 6.5W)

2026 Coastal Plains Combo 18 & over · 6.5 Combo Women 18 & over

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 22 7:00 PM
Greene Ridge Racquet Club
Oct 6 7:00 PM
Greene Ridge Racquet Club
2026-09-08vs GCC - Blount/Greene (6.5 18s)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKascia Henderson / Michelle Langston vs Kerry Smith / Mary-Marshall Greene1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Beissner / Kelli Dawson vs Beth Hopkins / Nicole Carlyle4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMegan Parker / Abbey Dail vs Azita Movahed / Lori Wagner6-3, 6-4
2026-09-01vs GCC - Blount/Greene (6.5 18s)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKascia Henderson / Mary Hardison vs Azita Movahed / Margaret Turner3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMegan Parker / Kelli Dawson vs Beth Perkins / Mary-Marshall Greene6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJessica Beissner / Amanda Albritton vs Monica Carlson / Sloan Carlson0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Combo Women 18 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GCC - Blount/Greene (6.5 18s)000000
2GR-Taylor (18s 6.5W)000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Ashley Elise
published 3.5
Connor Hardison
published 3.5
3.10
Jessica Beissner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Kascia Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Abbey Dail
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Amanda Albritton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Kelli Dawson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Michelle Langston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Parker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kascia Henderson + Ashley Elise3252% gamesnot enough data
Kascia Henderson + Jessica Beissner134 matchesnot enough data
Kascia Henderson + Michelle Langston033 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Beissner + Connor Hardison123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Elise
20W–20L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Connor Hardison
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jessica Beissner
18W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
Kascia Henderson
34W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Abbey Dail
4W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Amanda Albritton
17W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
Kelli Dawson
24W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63
Michelle Langston
12W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
Megan Parker
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.