Teams

Team Millette 3.5

2021 Frederick County Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2021-04-24vs Double Hot ShotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesSharon Edelstein / Kathleen Maiden vs Meghan Meade / Kelly Temple6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCora Ho / Susan Rhee vs Sabrina Alban / Melissa Truffer6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDeanne Iverson / Suzanne Krudys vs Sarah Kessler / Bridgett Patterson7-6, 6-3
2021-04-20vs Double Hot ShotsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHolly Erdely / Deanne Iverson vs Kelly Temple / Sabrina Alban2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Maiden / Sharon Edelstein vs Kimberly Price / Jen Wooden6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-17vs Double Hot ShotsWon 21
L#1 DoublesCora Ho / Melissa Galloway vs Kelly Temple / Linda McArthur4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSharon Edelstein / Kathleen Maiden vs Sarah Kessler / Joanna Coffey2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHolly Erdely / Diane Carson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-04-12vs Double Hot ShotsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathleen Maiden / Sharon Edelstein vs Melissa Truffer / Sabrina Alban7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2021-04-07vs Double Hot ShotsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMillette Miller / Cora Ho vs Jennifer Wheat / Christina Truax5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHolly Erdely / Paula Mittel vs Sarah Kessler / Kimberly Price7-6, 6-4
2021-04-05vs Double Hot ShotsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMillette Miller / Cora Ho vs Sabrina Alban / Melissa Truffer4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelissa Galloway / Kathleen Maiden vs Joanna Coffey / Kimberly Price7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-03vs Double Hot ShotsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathleen Maiden / Sharon Edelstein vs Jodie Phillips / Bridgett Patterson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2021-03-31vs Double Hot ShotsWon 20
W#1 DoublesCora Ho / Millette Miller vs Amy Dipasquale / Kelly Temple6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Maiden / Sharon Edelstein vs Sabrina Alban / Jodie Phillips6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-03-27vs Double Hot ShotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Rhee / Suzanne Krudys vs Amy Dipasquale / Kelly Temple6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSabina Spicher / Kathleen Maiden vs Jennifer Wheat / Linda McArthur6-3, 5-6
W#3 DoublesDeanne Iverson / Millette Miller vs Jodie Phillips / Sabrina Alban6-3, 6-4
2021-03-25vs Double Hot ShotsWon 20
W#2 DoublesSusan Rhee / Cora Ho vs Melissa Truffer / Sabrina Alban6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Maiden / Donna Jones vs Joanna Coffey / Linda McArthur3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-03-21vs Double Hot ShotsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Rhee / Suzanne Krudys vs Kelly Temple / Jodie Phillips6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathleen Maiden / Diane Carson vs Sarah Kessler / Mary Beth Herrera3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Susan Rhee
published
3.45
Deanne Iverson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Suzanne Krudys
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Cora Ho
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Diane Carson
published 3.5
3.11
Giselle Medina
published 3.5
3.08
Holly Erdely
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
HEATHER HUGHES
published 3
3.05
Kathleen Maiden
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.97
Donna Jones
published 3
Loan Nguyen
published
Millette Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Krudys + Giselle Medina2451% games+2.3% vs expected
Suzanne Krudys + Kathleen Maiden4359% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Rhee
32W–20L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
3.5
Deanne Iverson
165W–92L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Suzanne Krudys
152W–110L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Cora Ho
120W–87L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Diane Carson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Giselle Medina
28W–27L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Holly Erdely
78W–102L career · 3 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
HEATHER HUGHES
52W–19L career · no lines in 2021
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Kathleen Maiden
106W–188L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Donna Jones
21W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
2.97
Loan Nguyen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Millette Miller
7W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.